answersLogoWhite

0

Astrology is not considered a science by the mainstream scientific community. It is often classified as a pseudoscience because it lacks empirical support and does not adhere to the scientific method. While astrology involves the study of celestial bodies and their positions, its predictions and interpretations are not based on rigorous scientific evidence. Instead, astrology is often seen as a belief system or cultural practice.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Astronomy

Why asrology can not considered to be a science?

Astrology is not a science because it is not based on evidence and has not been properly explained.


Is astrology a branch of physical science?

Nowadays, it is not. Astronomy has taken out all non demonstrated and all non scientific aspects of Astrology and has taken its place in the physical sciences. However, in the past, astrology could be considered as a science as well as alchemy was replaced by chemistry.


Is astrology a fact based science?

Astrology is not considered a fact-based science by the scientific community. It is viewed as a pseudoscience because its claims and predictions are not supported by empirical evidence or the principles of science. While some people find personal meaning or connection through astrology, it is not an accepted scientific practice.


What does logy in the word astrology mean?

In the word "astrology," the suffix "-logy" means "study of." So, astrology refers to the study of the positions and movements of celestial bodies, such as planets and stars, and their purported influence on human affairs and natural events.


Which state would be true for astrology to be considered a science?

For astrology to be considered a science, it would need to demonstrate consistent, testable predictions that can be empirically validated through controlled experiments and observations. Additionally, it would require a theoretical framework grounded in established scientific principles, allowing for reproducibility and peer review. Currently, astrology lacks the rigorous methodology and empirical support necessary to meet these criteria.