A general assumption about the nature of things is the nature side of the nature/nurture debate. This side assumes that the characteristics of an individual are inherent and are not a product of the environment.
Wegener's ideas of continental drift were not immediately accepted by the scientific community because he did not have a satisfactory explanation for the mechanism that could move continents. Additionally, his hypothesis was contrary to the prevailing scientific beliefs at the time, which focused on fixed continents and seafloor spreading. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained wider acceptance.
Copernicus's ideas about the Sun being the center of the solar system were gradually accepted after the publication of his book "De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium" in 1543. It took several decades for his heliocentric model to become widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community.
"Skeptical" refers to an attitude of doubt or disbelief toward claims, statements, or ideas that lack sufficient evidence. A skeptical person often questions the validity of information and seeks proof before accepting it as true. This critical approach is commonly used in scientific inquiry and healthy discourse to challenge assumptions and promote rigorous examination of evidence.
because he cannot satisfy the geologists of that time by his answers about their questions and mainly he was unable to give answer that what was the power by which earth has floated over oceans.
printing press
yes he did ^_^
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on the evidence supporting them. Ideas that are consistent with experimental data and can be replicated by other researchers are more likely to be accepted. Conversely, ideas that lack evidence or are inconsistent with established scientific principles are more likely to be rejected.
paradigm
paradigm
Assumptions are basic premises or ideas accepted as true without proof, often serving as the foundation for further reasoning or investigation. In contrast, a scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of evidence gathered through observation and experimentation. While assumptions may guide hypotheses, scientific theories are rigorously tested and refined based on empirical data. Thus, assumptions are often unverified starting points, whereas scientific theories are validated frameworks that explain and predict phenomena.
New ideas may contradict existing, accepted ideas.
New scientific ideas are typically accepted or rejected based on evidence, experimental results, and how well they align with existing theories and principles. Ideas that can be tested, replicated, and provide new insights into the natural world are more likely to be accepted. Peer review by other experts in the field also plays a crucial role in evaluating the validity and significance of new scientific ideas.
Neils Bohr
The most accepted form of scientific ideas are those that are supported by strong evidence, reproducible experiments, and consensus among experts in the field. These ideas are often published in reputable scientific journals and have stood up to rigorous scrutiny and testing.
because some scientific theories are not true for this advanced world. e.g. the early ideas about phlogiston.
No, scientists do not exclusively rely on commonly accepted practices and theories; they often explore unconventional ideas and challenge existing paradigms. Scientific progress frequently arises from questioning established norms and conducting innovative experiments. While accepted theories provide a foundation, the scientific method encourages inquiry, skepticism, and the testing of new hypotheses to advance knowledge. This dynamic process is crucial for discovery and the evolution of scientific understanding.
The need for reform Challenging ideas about society Questioning commonly accepted ideas