Johannes Kepler
through observation and reasoning
Astronomers used a combination of mathematical calculations, observational skills, and analytical reasoning in the discovery of Neptune. They analyzed the gravitational effects of other planets, particularly Uranus, which exhibited deviations from its predicted orbit. By applying Newtonian physics, they calculated the potential location of an unknown planet influencing Uranus's orbit. This methodical approach culminated in the successful observation of Neptune in 1846, confirming their predictions.
Francis Bacon and René Descartes both shared a belief in the importance of empirical observation and rational thought as foundations for scientific inquiry. They emphasized the need for systematic experimentation and logical reasoning to acquire knowledge about the natural world. While Bacon is known for advocating the inductive method, Descartes focused on deductive reasoning, but both contributed significantly to the development of the scientific method. Their ideas laid the groundwork for modern scientific practices.
The statement "The moon was full 4 weeks ago, so it should be full again tonight" is an example of an inductive argument. It draws a general conclusion based on a specific observation—that the moon is typically full approximately every 29.5 days. While the reasoning may seem plausible, it does not guarantee that the moon will be full again tonight, as inductive reasoning is based on probability rather than certainty.
In "The Secret of the Old Clock" by Carolyn Keene, some of the clues that helped solve the mystery included a coded message left by Josiah Crowley, a hidden will, a clock with a secret compartment, and a mysterious woman's actions at a bridge. Nancy Drew used her keen observation skills and deductive reasoning to put all the pieces together and solve the case.
Deductive reasoning
deductive reasoning it is deductive reasoning........
disadvantages of deductive reasoning
deductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning varies from deductive reasoning as follows: 1) inductive reasoning is a reason supporting an argument and 2) deductive reasoning is an argument against an argument.
Deductive reasoning can be portrayed in the form of syllogisms.
deductive reasoning it is deductive reasoning........
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
which is the most important inductive or deductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as a "top down" approach, in other words deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. It often starts with a theory and is then narrowed down to an actual, testable hypothesis, that can be confirmed or denied by observation. Inductive reasoning is the inverse approach, a "bottom up" approach. It begins with an observation and through observation patterns and regularities are observed and can be applied to a more generalized theory.
Inductive reasoning moves from the general details to the specific details Deductive reasoning is reasoning from the specific details to the general details