You cannot use a microscope to view stars... you use a telescope.
And the answer is Galileo, in the early 1600's i believe
microscope
Magnifying glass, telescope, microscope, television etc.
The astronomer looked through the telescope's eyepiece to observe the stars.
The lens that you should use to first look at a slide on a microscope is a low power lens then move on to a higher power for more clarity.
The microscope that can achieve magnifications of up to a million times is typically a type of electron microscope, specifically the Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM). Unlike light microscopes that use visible light for imaging, TEMs use a beam of electrons, allowing for much higher resolution and magnification. This capability enables scientists to observe the fine details of cellular structures and materials at the nanometer scale.
microscope
To observe the stars, you would use a telescope.
Either a light microscope or an electron microscope can allow you to observe cell organelles.
Microscope?
Microscope. A scientist might use a microscope. Well actually, it depends on the size of the animal. If it is microscopic, then scientists might have to observe it using it using a microscope. If it can actually be seen, then scientists mught actually take a sample of it back to the labratory to observe physically.
Anton Van Leeuwenhoek
First of all atoms are invisible we will never see them okay. But you can use a electric microscope to observe and study them. Sadly they are huge and expensive
You would use an electron microscope to view a Golgi apparatus.
When you need to observe a live specimen
A microscope isn't used for navigating/exploring the universe. A microscope is for looking at germs, viruses etc. A telescope is able to look at the sky. A microscope is used in science labs. Not use for space explorering.
A microscope.
Use a plankton net.