0
What else can I help you with?
What did Einstein mean by science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
well, why don't you take a minute and think about it. Science is constantly proving religion wrong and it gives science an underlying purpose to keep moving forward with its work in every category while religion is constantly revising its interpretations of an apparently flawless book. While at the same time religion needs science because it does actually explain how some of the "miracles" could have occured if the people in the stories were the thinking kind of people who could predict wind patterns and sun locations. In short, they need each other I have a slightly different take on this subject. With regards to the first half of the statement, "science without religion is lame", I equate the statement to mean that science would be uninspiring and dull without religion. I infer this interpretation because of another of his quotes, "We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality." The second part of of the statement, "religion without science is blind", may be paraphrased as theories or attitudes held by people or organizations can go off in the wrong direction if not subjected to a structured and systematic study. Just my 2 cents.
What has one moon?
earth is the the only plznet that has one moon
Why do scientists believe Mars was once a wetter planet?
Scientists believe Mars was once a wetter planet because of geological features such as dried-up river valleys, lakebeds, and mineral deposits that suggest the presence of liquid water in the past. Additionally, data from Mars rovers and orbiters have detected evidence of ancient water flows and weathering processes that could have only occurred in a wetter environment.
Why do scientists think people could live on the moon Titus?
Titus has a cycle similar to our water cycle but with methane. On Titus it is so cold that methane becomes a liquid. The reason it is a possible colony is because it would have familiar terrain and atmosphere. I believe it has been said that you could survive on Titus without a suit for around 10 min. Until you die. This is great because it suggests that Titus could be used as a "second earth" when earth is consumed by the sun in the future when it becomes a red giant.
Why do some scientist believe life could form on Triton?
Some scientists believe life could form on Triton, Neptune's largest moon, due to its potential subsurface ocean beneath an icy crust. This ocean may contain the necessary ingredients for life, such as water and organic compounds. Additionally, the presence of geological activity, possibly driven by tidal forces from Neptune, could create a suitable environment for chemical reactions essential for life. The intriguing combination of these factors makes Triton a candidate for astrobiological studies.
Why did many Scientists believe science and religion could exist the same time?
There are scientists who still believe this to be possible. There has really been no clear evidence to indicate that they are mutually exclusive. Only opinions, assumptions and conjecture that varies depending on the scientist you are talking to. There has been nothing discovered by science that would indicate there not being an intelligent designer. There have, however, been many discoveries that do point convincingly to intelligent design.
Is believing in science a religion?
Any that have made any positive contribution to the human knowledge base do. Albert Einstein said "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind" Science cannot go anywhere without the goal of making the world a better place via religious values. As has been seen throughout history, religion without science goes way off track as well. Any that have made any positive contribution to the human knowledge base do. Albert Einstein said "Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind" Science cannot go anywhere without the goal of making the world a better place via religious values. As has been seen throughout history, religion without science goes way off track as well.
What was the primary religion of new york during 1700's?
Their was no main religion, anyone could believe or not believe in anything.
What religion should you believe in and why?
I quote the Walrus: I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me." You could be the Walrus... BELIEVE!!
What religion did the hopis believe in?
they belived in that they could do anything they wished for.
What is the role of religion in primitive science?
The early scientists were often the people whose time was dedicated to religion. As it was their job to question everything and look outside the mundane features of life, so it was often them who tried new things and made new discoveries. Science and religion commonly went hand-in-hand before richer societies could fund the research seperately and support more academics.
Are they artist which uses science in their work?
all scientists could be considered artists but actual Artist's that use science in their work? no, i think not.
Why is experimenting important to science?
Scientists use experiments to either confirm or disprove their hypotheses. Without this experimentation, science could not advance.
Why do scientists say that magic is science that we don't understand yet?
Scientists say that magic is science that we don't understand yet because some people will claim something is simply magic but scientists believe there is an explanation for it that we are unaware of.
What did Francis Bacon believe scientist could do?
Believed that scientists should rely on the bible.
What could we achieve if we knew how to use the knowledge of science?
Many jobs, such as Scientists, Doctors, and much more.
Why do science and scientists not believe in God?
The purpose of science is not to deny the existence of God, and a scientist is not an atheist by definition. Answer:Metaphysics is not the province of science, science deals with the real world . The purpose of science is to break down barriers to knowledge and utilize that knowledge to further mankind's understanding of the Universe. If science could prove (or disprove) the existence of god(s) the results would be unsatisfactory to all theists concerned. A proof that there was no god(s) would either not be accepted or cause the disappearance of religion. A proof that there was a god(s) would show that the god(s) are subject to the physical rules of the universe and subject to the scientists' tests. In either of these cases the god(s) would not be omnipotent or above everything, which would make them just another real world phenomenon, not supernatural.
