I already have. The space program wasn't getting anywhere as long as it depended
on me for its funding. I was truly gratified, thrilled, and delighted when the US created
the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA) at the federal level to take over
the job of not only paying for it, but also planning and operating the space program.
They have the time, money, and all the other necessary resources to do it right, and
it's a really important program that must be continued and adequately supported.
In 2008, the global spending on space activities was estimated to be around $70 billion. This includes expenditures on satellite launches, space exploration missions, research and development, and infrastructure maintenance.
Neither, spend more money on real health care for people. People are more important than any of those explorations.
Yes. If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU, the first computer on a chip. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!
In 2006, an estimated $37.46 billion was spent worldwide on space exploration initiatives. This included expenses from various space agencies, private companies, and research institutions involved in space exploration activities.
`kp3oj i ziij o' hudhnzm32hyvwrfbcvbevcb4fcbgtgshvbyr4543rwnopbaeh
yes- he was in favor of spending some money to explore space.
Ocean Eploration
In 2008, the global spending on space activities was estimated to be around $70 billion. This includes expenditures on satellite launches, space exploration missions, research and development, and infrastructure maintenance.
FALSE. NO. Wrong! You Fail!!
yes, of course."Should Malaysia join the race for space exploration".
Neither, spend more money on real health care for people. People are more important than any of those explorations.
Technologies like communication satellites have improved communication. Another invention inspired by space exploration is the artificial heart. Cons include heavy government spending to finance space exploration. and space pollution with orbital debris.
Yes. If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU, the first computer on a chip. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!
In 2006, an estimated $37.46 billion was spent worldwide on space exploration initiatives. This included expenses from various space agencies, private companies, and research institutions involved in space exploration activities.
yes.
Spending money on space exploration *is* investing in technology. You wouldn't have your computer today if NASA hadn't begun the search for smaller computers and electronics. None of that money goes to space, it is all spent down here, and the tech spinoff stays here too. How many millions of lives have been saved by, for example, accurate storm and hurricane tracking via satellites? And that is just one of many examples of how the investment has paid off many times over.
`kp3oj i ziij o' hudhnzm32hyvwrfbcvbevcb4fcbgtgshvbyr4543rwnopbaeh