`kp3oj i ziij o' hudhnzm32hyvwrfbcvbevcb4fcbgtgshvbyr4543rwnopbaeh
In 2008, the global spending on space activities was estimated to be around $70 billion. This includes expenditures on satellite launches, space exploration missions, research and development, and infrastructure maintenance.
One of the frequently heard opinions against the space program is that there are many needs for money here on earth, and it would be better to use that money for social programs, schools, corporate profits, medical research, helping the poor and the homeless, paying the national debt, etc., than to load up all of those enormous rocket ships with tons of thousand-dollar bills like they do, and send all of that money away into space.
Yes, space exploration is justified for several reasons. It can lead to scientific advancements, technological innovations, economic benefits, and a better understanding of the universe. Additionally, it can inspire people and serve as a symbol of human curiosity and ingenuity.
Yes. If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU, the first computer on a chip. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!
I already have. The space program wasn't getting anywhere as long as it depended on me for its funding. I was truly gratified, thrilled, and delighted when the US created the National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA) at the federal level to take over the job of not only paying for it, but also planning and operating the space program. They have the time, money, and all the other necessary resources to do it right, and it's a really important program that must be continued and adequately supported.
because people need to find more about the outer space ! XD No idea:)
yes- he was in favor of spending some money to explore space.
Because if they keep making them it will just cost more money. They are actually very old technology. The money they are spending on the shuttles could be spent on a better way to get anyone into space.
In 2008, the global spending on space activities was estimated to be around $70 billion. This includes expenditures on satellite launches, space exploration missions, research and development, and infrastructure maintenance.
One of the frequently heard opinions against the space program is that there are many needs for money here on earth, and it would be better to use that money for social programs, schools, corporate profits, medical research, helping the poor and the homeless, paying the national debt, etc., than to load up all of those enormous rocket ships with tons of thousand-dollar bills like they do, and send all of that money away into space.
Yes, space exploration is justified for several reasons. It can lead to scientific advancements, technological innovations, economic benefits, and a better understanding of the universe. Additionally, it can inspire people and serve as a symbol of human curiosity and ingenuity.
Yes. If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU, the first computer on a chip. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!
justified
Sunita Williams
IN my opinion no! it cost 14 MILLION! per person for two weeks i love astronomy and id love to try space travel one day so if you have the money go for it!This is all opinion:Two sides:1st Spending money to send anyone into space is foolish as that money could be spent on Earth to improve the environment and living conditions of millions of starving poor.2nd Space tourism is a necessary step in the progress of space flight and eventual colonization of the solar system.Only through commercial ventures and the innovation this brings will this colonization be possibleThe colonization of space is needed to protect the Human race from extinction.
left justified, single space
fully justified