Hi, The difference between new and malloc: 1.The New is a operator however malloc is a function 2.New returns the object type and there is no typecasting required. In malloc type casting should be done as it returns a void*. 3. The new operator can be overloaded however there is no over loading in C and hence Malloc can not be overloaded. 4. Operater New asks for the number of objects to be allocated however in malloc it will ask you for the number of bytes to be allocated. 5. The New operater will return you a exception of memory is not available however in malloc it will return u a NULL. 6. New is a concept for dynamically allocation in OOPS(C++) however malloc is used in C. The difference between the delete and free is as follows: 1. delete is a operator and can be overloaded however free is a function and can not be overloaded. With Regards, Shashiraja Shastry
You use the new operator to instantiate an object dynamically (at runtime) upon the heap (free store). You use the delete operator to release those same dynamic allocations when they are no longer required. The new and delete operators are similar to the malloc and free functions used in C (and which are still used today to implement these operators in the background). However, everything you could do with malloc and free you can also do with new and delete, including the instantiation of primitives, and is the preferred method of doing so in C++.
New and Delete are the memory management operators in c++,like c language we use malloc() and calloc() functions to allocate memory and free() functiong to release the memory similarily we use new to allocate memory in C++ and Delete to release the allocated memory....
The free() function releases memory obtained with the malloc() family of functions. The delete and delete [] operators release memory obtained with the new operator. Note: realloc() can allocate and free memories as well as reallocate.
You don't. Remember that C++ is a superset of the C language. You can still use the old malloc/free functions to perform your own memory allocation/deletion.
This involves allocating and de-allocating memory at run-time. Look into the new and delete operators for C++ or malloc and free for C.
Dynamic memory can be declared at run-time using the new and delete operators (or malloc and free in C), while static memory must be declared at compile-time.
If the array was allocated with new, then delete it with delete []. Otherwise, if it was allocated with malloc() then delete it with free. Otherwise, you cannot delete it because it was pre-allocated at link-load time by the compiler.
Are you talking about freeing dynamically allocated memory in C/C++? free() is a function that you use to release dynamically (i.e. at run-time) created memory in C, using malloc() or alloc() or such other functions. In the same way, delete() is a function that is used in C++ to release memory created at run-time using the function new(). (Note that you can still use malloc and other C functions in your C++ code, but it is not considered a good programming habit. Moreover, new() is easier to use and more flexible, once you get the hang of it. If this is not what you had in mind, then I do not know if this will be of any help to you. addition: -new is constructor of which delete is destructor so use in pairs always.. similarly use malloc with free.. extra note: - no type cast required for new , whereas malloc, free may require it. - new returns exception whereas malloc returns NULL when memory issue.
Memory management in C++ is achieved using the new and delete operators. These operators are synonymous with the malloc() and free() functions found in C, and which you can also use in C++ but then your code would not strictly be C++. However, the new and delete operators are implemented behind the scenes with malloc() and free(), so the distinction at this level is somewhat moot.Although the new operator and malloc() function effectively do the same job, the new operator greatly simplifies the process. Whereas malloc() requires that you specify the exact amount of memory required, the newoperator can determine the amount at compile time, based upon the type of memory required. Moreover, the new operator returns a pointer to the required type whereas the pointer returned by malloc() must be cast to the appropriate type.There's very little difference between the deleteoperator and the free() function, however they are not interchangeable. If memory was allocated with the newoperator, then it must be released with the delete operator, not the free() function.Apart from these differences, memory management in C++ is much the same as it was with C. Whether memory is allocated with the new operator or the malloc() function, you must maintain a pointer variable to hold the reference that is returned (or a NULL value if the allocation failed). When the memory is no longer required, it must be released back to the system by deleting or freeing the original pointer or a copy of the original pointer. At that point, all pointers to that memory are deemed invalid, and should be zeroed to ensure they no longer refer to invalid memory.Note that the malloc() function also has two variants: calloc() and realloc(). calloc() works much the same as malloc() but is used to allocate a count of contiguous memory blocks, like an array, while realloc() is used to release an existing allocation and allocate another to the same pointer. There is no equivalent operator for realloc()in C++.
Although C++ inherits malloc/calloc, realloc and free from C, programmers are encouraged to use the object-oriented operators, new and delete instead. Not only are they much easier to use, they can also be used with primitive data types.
Click on the link to your right for the answer.Answerboth malloc and new functions are used for dynamic memory allocations and the basic difference is: malloc requires a special "typecasting" when it allocates memory for eg. if the pointer used is the char pointer then after the processor allocates memory then this allocated memory needs to be typecasted to char pointer i.e (char*).but new does not requires any typecasting. Also, free is the keyword used to free the memory while using malloc and delete the keyword to free memory while using new, otherwise this will lead the memory leak. AnswerBesides the basic syntactical difference: malloc is a C function which will allocate the amount of memory you ask and that's it. new is a C++ operator which will allocate memory AND call the constructor of the class for which's object memory is being allocated. Similarily, free is a C function which will free up the memory allocated. but delete is a C++ operator which will free up the allocated memory AND call the destructor of the object.Answermalloc in a function and new is an operator, and its a good programming practice to use an operator instead of functions, because function itself requires some time to be executed whenever that particular function is called. so the main difference is that we use operators instead of malloc because of the TIME CONSTRAINT. Answer1.malloc requires the type casting during decleration , where as new doesn't needed the type casting during decleration 2. when ever we use new for allocating memory along with this it calls the constructor of the class for which object memory is allocated 3. in case of malloc free is the word used to clear the memory, where as delete is the format used in case of new to free the memory after usage 4. malloc is function, where as new is operator..so the time required for execution is less in case of new (it being a operator) as compared to malloc(it being a function) Answer1. malloc is a function call, while new is an operator. This difference is syntactic; behind the scenes, they both perform pretty much the same work to allocate the memory, and operator new also invokes any required constructors. There is a commonplace urban myth that operators are somehow faster in your code than functions; this is not correct, as any operator (except for mathematical operations that correspond directly to a single machine-code instruction) invocation amounts to a function call in any case. 2. malloc can fail, and returns a NULL pointer if memory is exhausted. Operator new never returns a NULL pointer, but indicates failure by throwing an exception instead. There is also a nothrow() version of operator new, which does return NULL on failure.
The malloc function is one of a group of memory allocation functions; malloc, calloc, realloc, and free. Specifically malloc (size) returns a pointer to a new memory block of at least size bytes, suitably aligned for optimum access for any basic type, or it returns a NULL if the request cannot be satisfied.