It can depend on what side of a war you are on. Think about the Native Americans and the Trail of Tears. What do they think of it and what did the soldiers who took them on the trip think. Also what did the people think who saw it. They were the ones who gave what they saw 'The Trail of Tears'.
It’s all different
Yes, history is interpreted as historians analyze and make sense of past events based on evidence and sources. Interpretations can vary depending on the historian's perspective, biases, and the available information.
If your doctor, for example, told some unauthorised person your medical history, that would be a breach of confidentiality
History does not repeat itself...
dividing history into different eras such as the iron and bronze age
It means to explain the differences between one thing and another thing. For example: Can you differentiate "power" and "force"? Or, can you differentiate "history" and "myth"?
Livy did not explain history. He reconstructed the history of early Rome, but did not present any theories about history.
Changing perceptions about our society can influence how historical events are interpreted and understood. As society's values and beliefs evolve, so too do our historical narratives. This allows for different perspectives to be considered and incorporated into the retelling of history, shaping our collective understanding of the past.
History formed when the events happened. Oral and written histories are just later retellings of those events as they were interpreted by the people retelling them and often do not accurately reflect the actual history.
A myth story refers to a traditional story that is accepted as history and serves to explain the world view of a people. For instance, there are some African creation stories that believe that the first man came out of a mountain.
Go to this link, it will explain it for you. :) http://thevintagescarf.hubpages.com/hub/The-History-Of-The-Bandana
History is the past of the occured.