The target's management may resist a takeover for reasons such as loss of control, job security concerns, or disagreement with the acquiring company's strategic direction. They may also believe that the acquisition undervalues the company or may be motivated by personal interests linked to their current position within the organization. Additionally, resistance could stem from a desire to maintain the company's independence or culture.
That the political system was broken and the Empire was no longer strong and cohesive enough to resist takeover by Eurasian peoples moving in.
In a takeover, shareholders of the target company typically benefit the most, as they often receive a premium on their shares. Additionally, executives and management of the acquiring company may benefit from increased compensation and expanded influence. Employees of the acquiring company may also see advantages if the takeover leads to growth and job security, while customers might benefit from improved products or services due to increased resources. However, stakeholders like employees of the target company may face uncertainty or layoffs post-takeover.
There are several advantages when a takeover happens within a business. The best thing is that essentially, a new pair of eyes are coming in to look at things and the company might improve.
sdsdsdsdssds
Resist with all your might.
That's because all unions are socialistic.
All of the above
autobahn
autobahn
Plants would grow gracefully and they might takeover the wild.
There are many reasons why an organization employ might change management consultants. An organization employ might change management consultants if the management consultant they first hired was not properly helping the organization solve business problems.
One might find this answer on a site such as Forbes. To find out how risk management and quality management policies affect stakeholders one also might inquire in to the response of a stock broker.