So that people in the future have prove that they lived back then
Written records.
So that people in the future have prove that they lived back then
we know that these written records were written thousands or recent ages. also they they lived there traditions and maybe what they ate. but acheologist figure that out by studying that area.
we know that these written records were written thousands or recent ages. also they they lived there traditions and maybe what they ate. but acheologist figure that out by studying that area.
they were the first chinese dynasty to leave written records behind.
They didn’t leave records, but did leave their settlements that historians have found.
They left nothing behind in writing. The difference between 'prehistoric' and later peoples is that we call them 'prehistoric ' if no written information has been left to us by them or about them.
We know more about the Aztec civilization compared to the Olmec because the Aztec civilization existed more recently and left behind more written records and archaeological evidence. The Olmec civilization, which predates the Aztec civilization by several hundred years, did not leave behind extensive written records, making it more challenging to study and understand.
The records of the Vikings attempt to settle in North America they left behind huts, jewelry, lamps, and tools.
No, written records were made. Actually Stonehenge was constructed by several different groups of people through time.
The lack of definitive evidence for dynasties preceding the Shang is primarily due to the scarcity of archaeological finds and written records from that period. While there are some artifacts and sites that suggest complex societies existed, they do not provide conclusive proof of organized dynasties. Additionally, the Shang dynasty itself is the first to leave behind substantial written records, making it challenging to trace earlier political entities. Consequently, our understanding of pre-Shang history remains largely speculative.
cherokee