Thoreau believed that majority rule could lead to injustice and lack of individual conscience. He argued that individuals should not blindly follow the majority if it goes against their own principles or moral beliefs. Thoreau valued the importance of individual autonomy and conscience above the will of the majority.
That individuals must judge right and wrong for themselves
An individual's relationship to government
He thinks it is not based on justice.
I think some modern transcendentalists are the Dalai Lama, and uh... OH! Kurt Kawohl. Definately Kurt. :( Sorry, but that's all I know. To tell you the truth I want the answer to this question myself. P.S. Previous answerer... you spelled orgasm wrong.
Transcendentalists generally believed that slavery was morally wrong and went against their principles of individualism, self-reliance, and equality. They advocated for the abolition of slavery and believed that all individuals, regardless of race, should have equal rights and opportunities. Some transcendentalists, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, actively participated in the abolitionist movement.
You've practically answered this question by asking it. Thoreau believed - and lived up to his beliefs - that just because MOST people were able to agree on a rule, that didn't necessarily make it a good rule. This was during a time when the notions of majority rule and "law and order" had reached almost religious veneration. Today we give a little lip service to the notion of "minority rights," but in many ways we continue to act in accordance with Roman dictum, "Vox populi, vox Dei" (The voice of the People is the voice of God) which often leads to the "tyranny of the majority." Some disturbing experiments in the 1950's showed the people were willing to do all sorts of horrible things as long as they were sanctioned in these by an authority figure; as long as they weren't, in the words of so many authority figures, "taking the law into their own hands." Thoreau's point was that the individual conscience was still in charge of each person's behavior, no matter what the "law" said.
He stayed at Walden foe two years, two months, and two days. He stayed from July 4, 1845 until September 6, 1847. He stayed at Walden for two years, two months, and two days. He stayed from July 4, 1845 until September 6, 1847.
Thoreau uses the example of a man who allows himself to be locked up in prison for failing to pay a tax to illustrate undue respect for the law. Thoreau argues that blindly obeying an unjust law, such as one that supports systems of oppression like slavery, is morally wrong.
Sure you can! You'll just be wrong a majority of the time.
"A Mate Can Do No Wrong" by Henry Lawson was published in 1896 in "While the Billy Boils", which is a collection of his short stories and sketches.
Yes, the majority is sometimes right! NOT always right, NOT never right, and NOT historically wrong but currently right
mate with females, aquire currency.