There would be no ruler in a "communist government" to use the terms of this question. This is because under true communism there would be no government at all. It would have withered away and disappeared as being unnecessary. The various industries in the economy would be run by administrators for the benefit of the entire society rather than individual profit. The "proletariat" or working class would not be the rulers, because communism would be a classless society. The terms "proletariat" and "bourgeoisie" refer to social classes and even these would have been wiped out under communism.
Prior to the true communist society and immediately after the overthrow of capitalism, society would go through a period of socialism, which would be ruled by a democratically elected "Dictatorship of the proletariat."
The proletariat, that is the workers who own nothing but the right to sell their own labor, would be rulers after the overthrow of the capitalist sytem, but NOT in a communist government.
There would be no ruler in a "communist government" to use the terms of this question. This is because under true communism there would be no government at all. It would have withered away and disappeared as being unnecessary. The various industries in the economy would be run by administrators for the benefit of the entire society rather than individual profit. The "proletariat" or working class would not be the rulers, because communism would be a classless society. The terms "proletariat" and "bourgeoisie" refer to social classes and even these would have been wiped out under communism.
Prior to the true communist society and immediately after the overthrow of capitalism, society would go through a period of socialism, which would be ruled by a democratically elected "dictatorship of the proletariat."
Karl Marx
The Communist view is that Communism has no classes and hence no role for government.
There are a couple of reasons; Karl Marx was an atheist and expressed this in his work. This obviously would influence "Marxist" thinkers. More practically, the Church in communist states would have been seen as "competition" to the government.
no one knows There is no such thing as a "communist government" if one is talking about communism according to Karl Marx. Marx stated as socialism evolved into communism the state, meaning government, would wither away as no longer being necessary. Thus if a country even has a government, it is not communist according to Karl Marx. Such countries might call themselves communist, but they are not.
No. Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto. While his ideas were put into practice when the Soviet Union formed, Marx never had any official power.
Karl meax is a father of communist.
No, quite the opposite. The bourgeoisie would be overthrown by the communist revolution.
karl marx
The Communist Manifesto was written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848.
Communist should be capitalized when you are referring to someone in the Communist party. Similarly, Communism should be capitalized when you are referring to the Communist party.
he wrote the communist manifesto because he believed that it would help mankind. he believed in it, and writing the communist manifesto, he thought it would help others see his point of view.
Karl Marx is considered the father of modern Communist theory. It is grounded in economics and critique of capitalism. He didn't speculate on what a communist society would be like (post-revolutionary society) so he cannot be considered a utopian philosopher and his Communist theory cannot be considered utopian. He was certainly not a fascist.