There are reasons that front breaks are more expensive. It may be more expensive to replace front breaks more then rear breaks, because the uses front breaks more.
Front brakes have significantly more stopping power than rear brakes.
No, rear brakes do not typically wear faster than front brakes. In most vehicles, front brakes wear out faster due to the weight transfer during braking, which puts more stress on the front brakes.
front front - rear rear.
The front brakes on any vehicle do most of the stopping. When you apply the brakes the weight shifts to the front of the vehicle. For this reason the front brakes are needed more than the rear. Try stopping a vehicle with just the hand brake which applies only the rear brakes.
becasuse its a rear wheel drive vehicle
Of course. All vehicles have front & rear brakes.
Rear brakes wear faster than front brakes because they handle less weight and pressure during braking, causing them to work harder and wear out more quickly.
The front and rear brakes are both made of ceramic. i bought front and rear brakes on eBay for $80 total.
Yes.
Front brakes wear faster than rear brakes because they bear a greater portion of the vehicle's weight and are responsible for most of the braking force during stops. This increased workload causes them to wear down more quickly than the rear brakes.
Front pads (disc brakes) Rear shoes (drum brakes)