Not really. He could not offend the monarch of course, and the king or queen might command a performance of a play. However, Shakespeare's bread and butter was the public who bought tickets to go to the theatre. Those were the people he wrote to please.
Macbeth.
Mainly iambic pentameter. Please see the link.
Shakespeare did not write in acts, none of the quartos are divided into acts. This can be validated by looking at the original quartos in the British Library site. This is a product of editing for the first portfolio.
If Shakespeare had a lover, we don't know who it was. Likewise, he didn't dedicate his plays to anyone. If someone said to him, "Please if you love me Willie darling write me a play about Titus Andronicus" we have no record of it.
Shakespeare tailored his plays to please the monarchy by incorporating themes of loyalty, power, and the divine right of kings, often portraying monarchs in a favorable light. He also included references to contemporary events and figures that resonated with the ruling class, enhancing the relevance of his works. Additionally, he often staged performances for royal audiences, using elaborate costumes and settings to impress and entertain the court. This alignment with royal interests helped secure his status and patronage from influential figures, including King James I.
Is this a question? William Shakespeare did write his plays.
William Shakespeare did not write anything called Merlin the Magician
William Shakespeare did not write novels. The initials "BB" have no relevance to anything Shakespeare did write either.
Shakespeare died in 1616. He didn't write anything is the 50's
It was his job, or one of his jobs. Shakespeare was paid to write plays.
shakespeare wrote about tragicomedies and romance
In school perhaps. But Shakespeare was not forced to write after he left school. Most actors were not also playwrights. But since Shakespeare could write and was very good at it, and was paid to do it, why not?