Knights were supposed to uphold honour and be chivalrous.
They swear fealty to their king or liege lord and are expected to keep the peace of the lands.
In times of war, knights would be expected to ride under the banner of their kings and defend their lands.
Knights who own land are also expected to look after their subjects.
A code of ethics can be defined as a formal statement of ethical principles with regard to some stated activity, such as for example, a doctor's code of ethics, a police code of ethics, a priests code of ethics, etc.
NAADAC Code of Ethics
In the Texas Administrative Code there is a Code of Ethics and Standard Practices for Texas Educators. The National Education Association has a code of ethics for teachers. The Association of American Educators has a code of ethics for educators
chivalry i thinkthe code of chivalry
Some (most) knights did abuse their power but the code of chivalry was supposed to stop them doing this.
is forever 21 a code of ethics
An ethic code outlines the mission and core values of a business or organization, and the standards to which the professional will be held. The ethics code defines how professionals are supposed to approach problems.
what is JC Penney Code of Ethics?i dont know
Some (most) knights did abuse their power but the code of chivalry was supposed to stop them doing this.
Ethics and the law
code of ethics for information technology
No, if it were multi-ethical it would not have been an empire. The same rules, laws and code of ethics were supposed to be enforced empire-wide. If you mean multi-ethnical, yes, it was, because it encompassed many ethnic groups or peoples.No, if it were multi-ethical it would not have been an empire. The same rules, laws and code of ethics were supposed to be enforced empire-wide. If you mean multi-ethnical, yes, it was, because it encompassed many ethnic groups or peoples.No, if it were multi-ethical it would not have been an empire. The same rules, laws and code of ethics were supposed to be enforced empire-wide. If you mean multi-ethnical, yes, it was, because it encompassed many ethnic groups or peoples.No, if it were multi-ethical it would not have been an empire. The same rules, laws and code of ethics were supposed to be enforced empire-wide. If you mean multi-ethnical, yes, it was, because it encompassed many ethnic groups or peoples.No, if it were multi-ethical it would not have been an empire. The same rules, laws and code of ethics were supposed to be enforced empire-wide. If you mean multi-ethnical, yes, it was, because it encompassed many ethnic groups or peoples.No, if it were multi-ethical it would not have been an empire. The same rules, laws and code of ethics were supposed to be enforced empire-wide. If you mean multi-ethnical, yes, it was, because it encompassed many ethnic groups or peoples.No, if it were multi-ethical it would not have been an empire. The same rules, laws and code of ethics were supposed to be enforced empire-wide. If you mean multi-ethnical, yes, it was, because it encompassed many ethnic groups or peoples.No, if it were multi-ethical it would not have been an empire. The same rules, laws and code of ethics were supposed to be enforced empire-wide. If you mean multi-ethnical, yes, it was, because it encompassed many ethnic groups or peoples.No, if it were multi-ethical it would not have been an empire. The same rules, laws and code of ethics were supposed to be enforced empire-wide. If you mean multi-ethnical, yes, it was, because it encompassed many ethnic groups or peoples.