Yes
'A rose by any other name would still smell as sweet'
Juliet is basically talking about how names mean nothing in a person. She says "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet" meaning that Romeo would still be as sweet if or if he wasn't a montegue. (since their families are enemies)
Juliet uses an analogy when she says, "a rose by any other name would smell as sweet" (2.2.43-44); her point is that Romeo's surname,"Montague," shouldn't matter. If a rose were called a "cabbage," it would still smell sweet; and even though Romeo's name is the name of her family enemy, he's still wonderful.
A Rose by any other name would smell as sweet... (Look it up.. :)
"That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet" are words spoken by Juliet in William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.
It is an adjective.
Shakespeare wrote Romeo and Juliet, in which that quote made its first appearance. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."
Fragrance, sweet smell
In my opinion, that which we call arose by any other name would smell as sweet.
Yes. It is in Romeo and Juliet: "What's in a name? that which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet."
It was written by William Shakespeare in the play "Romeo and Juliet". "What's in a name? that which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet'' it was spoken by JULIET TO ROMEO IT MEANS ThAT A NAME IS NOT IMPORTANT BECAUSE YOU CAN CALL A PERSON ANY OTHER NAME BUT IT WILL STILL BE THE SAME PERSON xD
Juliet meant that like if a rose was called anything else it would still smell sweet, referring to Romeo, saying that if he were named anything else he would still be sweet despite his last name. He is still the same guy even if he is a Montague, so if it is only a matter of names he could change names, or if he didn't want to, she would change hers and no longer be a Capulet.