0
What else can I help you with?
What theory of motivation most clearly emphasizes the importance of genetic predispositions?
The evolutionary theory of motivation emphasizes the importance of genetic predispositions in influencing behavior and motivation. This theory suggests that certain behaviors and motives have evolved over time due to their adaptive value in promoting survival and reproduction.
Do you suspect scientists of having an ulterior motive in comig up with the idea of speciation through natural selection and adaptation?
No, the theory of speciation through natural selection and adaptation is based on extensive scientific evidence and research. Scientists aim to understand and explain natural phenomena using evidence-based methods rather than having ulterior motives.
. What is the purpose of a pentad?
The purpose of a Pentad, when referred to in advertising, is to elaborate on a slogan. This definition is also the answer when asked on NovaNET English Prescriptive IIIB course.
What is it about humans that has allowed the problem to get so critical?
Several factors have contributed to the critical nature of various problems, including a lack of foresight in addressing long-term consequences, a focus on short-term gains over sustainability, and a disconnect between actions and their environmental or social impacts. Additionally, the influence of vested interests, political agendas, and profit-driven motives has hampered effective solutions to these critical issues.
What is the central dogma and who challenged it?
The term "central dogma" of molecular biology is often taken to mean the flow of information from the DNA in the nucleus of the cell, into messenger RNA via transcription, and thence into proteins (more correctly, polypeptide chains) via translation at ribosomes in the cytoplasm.1. The DNA replicates its information in a process that involves many enzymes: replication.2. The DNA codes for the production of messenger RNA (mRNA) during transcription.3. In eukaryotic cells, the mRNA is processed(essentially by splicing) and migrates from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.4. Messenger RNA carries coded information to ribosomes. The ribosomes "read" this information and use it for protein synthesis. This process is called translation.* * *If this question is taken to refer to the above sense of "central dogma", and the "challenge" therefore to the "reverse" flow of information: from RNA to DNA, that was found to be routine in retroviruses (such as HIV, which causes AIDS), using the enzyme reverse transcriptase. The names of David Baltimoreand Howard Temin are particularly associated with the discovery of this enzyme.In fact, this question opens a can of worms! It's all to do with what people take the term "central dogma" to mean.In 1958 Francis Crick coined two terms for two ideas that were then considered fruitful in guiding future research. This was five years after the publication of Watson and Crick's double-helix model for DNA, and three years before the genetic code began to reveal itself through experiments by Nirenberg and Matthaei ("polyU" coding for phenylalanine, etc.) and by Crick and Brenner (the code consisting of three nucleotides).The two ideas were:1The sequence of residues in DNA informs the biosynthesis of proteins (we would now say polypeptides), specifically the sequence of residues (amino acids). Logically enough, Crick called this idea the sequence hypothesis.2Once information (about the sequence of residues) has passed into a protein, it does not come out; in other words, the amino acid sequence of a polypeptide chain does not influence the synthesis of DNA, RNA, or other polypeptide chains. Crick called this the central dogma.In later years, among other things:Watson published a book, Molecular biology of the gene, in which he confused Crick's two points, using the term "central dogma" in a way that relates it to the sequence hypothesis. Watson did not use the term "sequence hypothesis". There has now developed a widespread myth, especially associated with the United States, that the idea of the sequence hypothesis was calledby Crick the "central dogma".Some people who had not read Crick's paper, and knew little of his mind and modus operandi as a scientist, accused him of trying to stifle research, by being "dogmatic" that information could flow only from DNA to RNA to protein, and never in the reverse direction. Crick never said that, as a read of his 1958 paper confirms.Crick wrote a note, published in Nature in 1970, trying to put the record straight. He particularly mentioned by name Barry Commoner as someone who had misquoted him (and, implicitly, someone who had used the misquotation to draw false conclusions about Crick's reasoning and motives).Crick much later admitted that when he chose the word "dogma" he thought it was more or less close in meaning to "hypothesis".Does Crick's central dogma hold true? NO. 1.) A viruses genome consists of RNA. 2.) The process of DNA to RNA to protein can actually be reversed (aka complementary DNA).Prions do not challenge Crick's dogma. The modifications to proteins that prions effect are to secondary structure (coiling and so on), not to the primary structure (the amino acid sequence).***Crick's "Central Dogma" has been contradicted by countless experimental facts. However, "facts don't kill theories - only more advanced theories kill obsolete theories". "The Principle of Recursive Genome Function" (Pellionisz, 2008) showed that by retiring the old mistaken axioms of BOTH JunkDNA and Central Dogma we accomplish the theoretical breakthrough towards "Recursive Genome Function".
What did Freud say about your conscious thoughts?
Freud believed that conscious thoughts represent only a small portion of our mental processes. He thought that deeper, unconscious motives and desires influenced our conscious thoughts and behaviors. Freud's theory of the unconscious highlighted the importance of exploring hidden aspects of the mind to understand human behavior.
When do you say emotions and motives moving forces of behavior?
Emotions and motives move the forces of behavior. It is because a person with better emotions will have better behavior.
Why are unconscious motives much difficult to ferret out?
If they are unconscious then people do not know or realise them and therefore can not talk about them. Also they are usually unconscious for a good reason and you have no rite to ferret them out.
Why people should or should not consider motives and goals as characteristic adaptations?
Motives and goals (which delve a bit deeper into personality than simple personailty traits) should be considered characteristic adaptations. As you probably know, the psychology of personality is divided into several "levels" of personality - the first level being dispositional traits (for example, the Big 5) and the second level being constructed of characteristic adaptations, which are similar to dispositional traits, but are more specific and changeable and are contextualized over time and as a person begins to understand their societal role. (Beginning in late/middle childhood and continuing from there.) Motives are usually considered to be part of the unconscious (traits are conscious) and goals are merely steps to satisfy those motives. Therefore, motives and goals are characteristic adaptations.Hope that helps!
Meaning of self awareness?
Self awareness is the conscious knowledge one's feelings, motives, feelings and desires.
Difference between emotional buying motives and rational buying motives?
Rational motives are conscious, factual, and logical reasons for a purchase. Emotional motives are feelings experienced by a customer through association with a product. Love, guilt, fear, and social approval often prompt us to buy.
What are motives and explain different types of motives?
Motives are internal factors that drive a person to behave in a particular way. Some common types of motives include biological motives (such as hunger and thirst), social motives (such as the need for affiliation and achievement), and emotional motives (such as the desire for love and acceptance). These motives can interact and influence behavior in various ways.
What is the difference between psychodnamic and behavior perspective?
Psychodynamic perspective focus on our unconscious thoughts. Psychodynamic psychologist tend to focus on our inner lives such as our hidden motives and deeper most fantasies and dreams. Behavior perspective also known as behaviorist focus on observable behavior. They highly emphasize the role of environment in modeling of behavior and tend to reject introspection (careful self- examination of conscious thoughts).
Why are unconscious motives much more difficult to ferret out?
Unconscious motives are more difficult to discover because they often give few, if any outward signs. They may be masked by conscious behaviors.
What are alterior motives?
Ulterior motives are hidden or undisclosed reasons for someone's actions or behavior that are different from the reasons they claim. These motives are typically self-serving and may not align with the overt intentions being expressed.
Assuming a person's behavior is based on certain motives is called?
Assuming a person's behavior is based on certain motives is called attribution. This involves assigning reasons or causes to explain why someone acts a certain way.
What is the professional title for a psychologist who studies how unconscious motives and conflicts determine human behavior?
Well, scientifically speaking, that would have to be an Unconciousologist.Source:Who_studies_how_unconscious_motives_and_conflicts_determine_human_behavior
