Temperature affects the rate of cell progress that is the mitotic rate to quite some extent. With the increase in temperature(3-25 degrees C) the mitotic cycle rate increases linearly.
petri dish, broth, diff. temps. easy.
The primary productivity or "bottom up" hypothesis suggests that plant growth is limited by the energy available to plants which is determined in turn by temperature and precipitation. Additional plant growth means more forage is available--thus herbivores, and ultimately carnivores, should increase in abundance.
Urey and Miller provided evidence for the possibility for inorganic substances to produce organic (living) substances. They simulated hypothetical conditions which would be present in the early Earth. They showed how gasses of an anoxic environment, combined with static electricity could form simple organic compounds and Amino Acids. out of 22 amino acids created, 13 where those used to make proteins in living cells. This experiment has been replicated successfully to provide a similar outcome each time. Mckenzie was here :3
sarcastic (apex)
optimality theory
That the parents were both heterozygous!
Clean up. But, more importantly, you compile and analyze the observed and recorded data to see if it supports the original assumption of the experiment. Or if it disproves the hypothesis conclusively. Or if the data suggests a different connection between the variables being studied.
rotating cloud
In the scientific method this would be called the "hypothesis".
The primary productivity or "bottom up" hypothesis suggests that plant growth is limited by the energy available to plants which is determined in turn by temperature and precipitation. Additional plant growth means more forage is available--thus herbivores, and ultimately carnivores, should increase in abundance.
A hypothesis is what someone suggests could be true, and then tests it to see whether or not it is true. A law is what has been proven to be true.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through research, while a theory is a well-established explanation that has been repeatedly tested and supported by evidence. A law is a statement that describes a natural phenomenon but does not attempt to explain why it occurs. Laws are typically based on empirical observations and are more straightforward than theories.
My hypothesis suggests, 19, estimated. Sorry for the mis-endeavours.
Others have said twice: it is called Punctuated Equilibrium.
the hypothesis might be correct* * * * *The available evidence suggests that the observations were less likely to have been obtained from random variables that were distributed according to the null hypothesis than under the alternative hypothesis against which the null was tested.
i would have to say the answer is..........theory is the explanation of things or events based on scientific knowledge resulting from many observations and experiments and law is the statement about how things work in nature that seems to be true consistently.
The nebular hypothesis is the most widely accepted model in the field of cosmogony to explain the formation and evolution of the Solar System (as well as other planetary systems). It suggests that the Solar System formed from nebulous material.
The dopamine hypothesis suggests that schizophrenia is caused by an overactivity of dopamine neurons.