It is not correct to say that individuals evolved because it is not possible for an individual to change drastically over their own timelife. Species have the faculty to evolve as a whole not as individual organisms.
It is incorrect to say that an individual evolves because it is impossible for them to change drastically over their own lifetime. Species evolve not individual organisms.
Wikipedia says: 'Evolution is change in the genetic material of a population of organisms from one generation to the next'. Therefore an individual cannot be said to evolve.
If they do not evolve, they may eventually die out.
Populations evolve.
evolve
Single individuals are naturally selected, but populations ( can be whole species ) evolve. Any mutation happening in the germ line of an individual will die with him. Only his progeny can inherit said mutation and evolve. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms.
the ozone layer began to develop shielding earth from ultraviolet rays, this was hypothesized that these changes allowed species of single celled organisms to evolve into more complexed organisms
lemarck ideas of evolution are known as the inheritance of acquire characteristic what was incorrect about his theory of how organisms evole
yes it is highly possible
Populations evolve, but individuals are selected. Natural selection affects individual organisms.
Lamarck did. Neodarwinism theorises that species evolve when gene frequencies change, not individual organisms. Larmarkism is true for epigenetic inheritance, favourable and unfavourable characteristics alike.
No
all of the organisms can evolve.
If they do not evolve, they may eventually die out.
Just explain that micro organisms are made up of cells, can grow, can reproduce, and that they go through stages of developement and evolve.
Populations evolve.
Darwin said that organisms evolve through the process of natural selection.
individuals do not evolve
individuals do not evolve