Robert Hooke Discovered the cell in 1665
Yes. Robert Hooke saw cells in cork when he observed it under the microscope. What he actually observed was the cell walls of dead cork cells. He called them cells because they reminded him of the rooms (cells) of monks in a monastery.
The cells that were first seen were nonliving.
Robert Hooke fave this name to the cells he saw in a piece of cork becuse the reminded him of the cells that monks live in. They, like many plant cells, were square. If he had seen an animal cell the name may have not been " cell. "
The first cell ever seen under a microscope was cork cell, observed by Robert Hooke in 1665. He described them as resembling the cells (small rooms) in a monastery, hence the term "cell" was coined.
Cells.
The first seen cells were non-living and they were found by Robert Hooke in a sample of cork.
Viruses are too small, and can't be seen in an optic microscope.
Hooke looked at a slice of cork and saw that it look like a cell where monks and nuns used to sleep.
Robert hooke
Cork cells from plants were first observed under a microscope by Robert Hooke.
The first seen cell was non-living. It was founded by Robert Hooke in 1665 in a piece of cork.
he was taunting Robert hooke
Robert Hooke Discovered the cell in 1665
Yes. Robert Hooke saw cells in cork when he observed it under the microscope. What he actually observed was the cell walls of dead cork cells. He called them cells because they reminded him of the rooms (cells) of monks in a monastery.
Robert Hooke's cork cells appeared empty because he was observing dead cell walls. Live cells have contents that can be easily seen under a microscope, but in cork cells, the living material had decayed and left behind only the empty cell walls, making them appear hollow.
Yes. He himself told one of his main rivals, Robert Hooke, "if I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants".