0
How does urey's and miller's experiment support the theory that scientists think that the first life forms probably arose from nonliving materials?
Scientists don't "think" that the first life forms arose from non-living materials. However, they do accept abiogenesis as the only testable theory on the origins of life, as we know it.
The Miller-Urey experiment set out to prove that the chemical components of life can arise from natural processes. While it does not prove life can come from non-living matter, it does show that its' components can arise naturally.
What else can I help you with?
True or false Scientists think that the first life forms on earths probably did arise from nonliving materials?
True. Scientists believe that the first life forms on Earth likely arose from nonliving materials through a process known as abiogenesis. This theory suggests that simple organic molecules gradually evolved into more complex structures that eventually led to the development of life.
Why are scientists so interested in genetics?
Scientists are interested in genetics because it helps them understand how traits and diseases are inherited, how organisms evolve, and how they can develop new treatments or technologies based on genetic information. By studying genetics, scientists can also uncover the underlying mechanisms that drive various biological processes.
What are some nonliving things in a snowy mountain?
Yeahh, mountain lions, bears, maybe even a person or two. If the mountain is not that high other four-legged animals can live there w/ small wildlife. If the mountain is covered w/ snow mtn. lions & bears will probly still there. Most likely theres a river that's flowing that has fish in it.
What does Non-Living mean?
Something that is dead is non living, but something that is non living isn't necessarily dead (that's probably confusing). Example: rocks are non living but not dead. Dead means it once lived but does no more. Non living usually means it never lived. http://www.usoe.k12.ut.us/curr/science/sciber00/7th/classify/living/2.htm
Will scientists one day be able to grow whole organs in the future?
At the moment we don't really know if this will happen or not and we would have to wait and see but i think that scientists will be able as they can grow new heart valves so they probably will be able to grow new organs using stem cells because the organs do form when a baby is born so that's probably what scientists will try to do just copy the method and then they should be able to do it. Hope it helped it's my science homework! LOL :)
True or false Scientists think that the first life forms on earths probably did arise from nonliving materials?
True. Scientists believe that the first life forms on Earth likely arose from nonliving materials through a process known as abiogenesis. This theory suggests that simple organic molecules gradually evolved into more complex structures that eventually led to the development of life.
Sometimes scientists make a mistake or?
Ahh, Your probably doing a crossword puzzle. The answer you are looking for should be Error. If the question is Scientists make a mistake, or ______, and need to do an experiment again.? Then you got the answer.
After the experiment scientists organize and do what with the data?
For this answer you are probably completing a crossword puzzle but crossword solvers don't work!!Answer: After the experiment scientists organize and INQUIRE the data.
What is the answer to the clue 'When scientists make mistakes or'?
A mistake a scientist makes is called an error. You're probably doing a crossword puzzle. The answer you are looking for should be Error. If the question is Scientists make a mistake, or ______, and need to do an experiment again.? Then you have the answer.
When you are done with an experiment why do you wash your hands?
Probably because many people have touched the materials so if you don't some of the bacteria could get into yourbody.
Why do groups of scientists often work together and why is it important for scientists to describe objects completely?
if groups of scientists didn't work together they would go at different speeds and probably get different results need to describe it completely so that when they use that same factor in an experiment they have the data.
Why do scientists still use the scientific method today?
Probably because it is the most accurate way to carry out a scientific experiment. It reminds scientists to research thoroughly and to keep track of what is occurring in the experiment. So that if something that is unecessary happens, they could easily find out what happened through data that was written down. Because it works.
What is important for both laboratory and field scientists?
Maintaining the Scientific Method and a proper experiment with controlled variables. Probably more concern would be in a less controlled field environment.
Why do scientists carry out experiment?
scientists carry out experiments to test theories or ideas. for example, if they wanted to prove that if you hold a lens up to your eye that it can burn your retina, they would probably put a lens in front of a cow eye or an animal eye to test the theory.
Does the height of shape of the glass affect the experiment?
That probably depends on the experiment.
What Was The Name Of Robert A. Millikan Experiment?
That should probably be "Millikan". The experiment he was famous for is the Millikan Oildrop Experiment.
What is a experiment without a variable?
An experiment has to have a varible, if it doesn't that it's probably and engineering experiment or robotics. I think its called a "control"
