0
Most religious creation myths teach that human beings (and every other form of life), were created specially, separate from all the others, for a particular divine purpose.
Evolutionary theory does not award the human race (or any other kind of life) with a special position. Each and every living thing is the end product, the summum, of a long history of surviving common ancestors, producing diverging lineages. According to evolutionary theory, we're special not because of our origins, but because of the characteristics we've evolved, which set us - but every other life form as well - apart from all the others. There is no overriding purpose to our being special, according to evolutionary theory. We're merely a product of differential reproductive success.
I believe that, in the basis, it is the issue of needing to be special in combination with the need for some overriding purpose that causes fundamentalists to reject evolutionary theory as an explanation for the diversity of life. See the answer below for an example of this.
Answer:
Fundamentalism, and religion in general, is at odds with evolutionary theory because evolutionary theory tends to be taught with the implicit message that God is not part (or need not be part) of the picture, that people do not have souls, and that there's no life after this one.
What else can I help you with?
Why do you think evolution became such a hot button issue in the 1920's?
Evolution became a hot button issue in the 1920s due to the clash between scientific advancements and traditional religious beliefs. The Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925 brought national attention to the debate over the teaching of evolution in schools, sparking further public interest and controversy. Additionally, the rise of fundamentalism in religious communities contributed to the intensity of the debate.
What occurred when the teaching of evolution was challenged by fundamentalists?
I think it was 1987 when the Supreme Court ruled that no state could block the teaching of evolution and that creationism was religion and violated the Establishment Clause of the Constitution.
What is the evolution controversy?
The controversy regarding evolution is the debate about the validity of the scientific model sparked by the inability of various religious groupings to reconcile this scientific teaching with their religious views. This controversy is not a scientific one, but exists solely in the minds of those who would seek to suppress the teaching of scientific models that conflict with their beliefs.
Legal battle over teaching evolution that pitted modern science?
The legal battle over teaching evolution, such as the Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925, was a showdown between modern science and religious beliefs. These conflicts often revolved around the separation of church and state, with proponents of evolution arguing for the teaching of scientific principles in schools without religious interference. The outcomes of these legal battles have shaped the modern education system and continue to influence discussions around science literacy and religious freedom.
In 1925 John Scopes was prosecuted for teaching the theory of evolution in a public school classroom?
Yes, John Scopes was a high school teacher in Tennessee who was charged with violating the state's Butler Act, which prohibited the teaching of evolution in schools. The trial, known as the Scopes Monkey Trial, gained national attention and highlighted the debate between creationism and evolution in education. Scopes was ultimately found guilty and fined, although the verdict was later overturned on a technicality.
How did Fundamentalists were at odds with teaching of evolution?
Fundamentalists are at odds with the teaching of evolution because they believe it is not compatible with the teaching of creation. They believe the Bible teaches creation.
How were religious issues and fundamentalism at odds with the teaching of evolution?
well, obama is actually a plant. he was grown in the goverment officials garden. Thats why he goes outside to retrieve sunlight and drinks water. Hence photosynthesis.
What brought the conflict between the teaching of evolution and religious fundamentalism to a head?
The conflict between the teaching of evolution and religious fundamentalism was brought to a head primarily due to the theory of evolution challenging literal interpretations of religious texts, particularly regarding the origin of life and humans. This conflict was further fueled by the growing influence of scientific advancement and education, as well as the rise of fundamentalist movements seeking to defend traditional religious beliefs.
What was a the challenge to religious fundamentalism in the 1920?
One of the challenges to religious fundamentalism in the 1920s was the Scopes Monkey Trial, where the teaching of evolution in public schools clashed with the belief in creationism. This trial highlighted the tensions between science and religion and raised questions about the role of religion in education and society.
What was the result of the scopes 'monkey trail'?
The law prohibiting the teaching of evolution was upheld
When did the monkey trial take place?
John Scopes for teaching Evolution
How did fundamentalism influence the Scopes Monkey trial?
William Jennings Bryan, three-time Democratic candidate for President and a populist, led a Fundamentalist crusade to banish Darwin's theory of evolution from American classrooms.The Great Commoner came to his cause both out a concern that the teaching of evolution would undermine traditional values he had long supported and because he had a compelling desire to remain in the public spotlight.Bryan transformed himself into a 'sort of Fundamentalist Pope.'By 1925, Bryan and his followers had succeeded in getting legislation introduced in fifteen states to ban the teaching of evolution. The states enacted bills making it unlawful 'to teach any theory that denies the story of divine creation as taught by the Bible and to teach instead that man was descended from a lower order of animals.'The whole thing was a way that Bryan used the trail to glorify himself and not so much as to defend his beliefs. He used Fundamentalism as tool for his aims.
Who was John Scopes?
John Scopes was a teacher known for being tried for teaching evolution to his students. During his trial, known as the Scopes trial, he contended that evolution should be allowed to be taught, but was ultimately found guilty.
What conflict did the Tennessee trial of John Scopes illustrate?
The Tennessee trial of John Scopes, also known as the Scopes Monkey Trial, illustrated the conflict between those who held religious beliefs, particularly creationism, and those who supported the teaching of evolution in schools. The trial highlighted the tension between religious fundamentalism and modern scientific thought in American society during the early 20th century. It became a landmark case in the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools.
What is the theme of Inherit The Wind?
One inspiration includes the real-life trial, which took place in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925. Another inspiration includes the importance of the case. Throughout the book, the fight between science vs. religion plays as the main source of conflict. This trial helped repeal the law against evolution, which is a reason why evolution is taught in schools today.
Does the teaching of evolution violate the 1st amendment?
no it does not
Why do you think evolution became such a hot button issue in the 1920's?
Evolution became a hot button issue in the 1920s due to the clash between scientific advancements and traditional religious beliefs. The Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925 brought national attention to the debate over the teaching of evolution in schools, sparking further public interest and controversy. Additionally, the rise of fundamentalism in religious communities contributed to the intensity of the debate.
