Having used the word "created" in the question, the theory of evolution is negated in the answer. Only one answer exists then: God called it into existence. It in this case was "the heavens," which by the original text specifically means literally space, as in distance and the potential for location.
No, a waterfall is not a living thing. It is a natural phenomenon created by the flow of water over rocks or a steep surface.
Sand is usually made of small particles of rock which were never alive or part of a living thing, although it is also possible to make sand out of sea shells, which are part of a living thing although they are not actually alive. Shells are a secretion of living things. No, sand was and never will be a living thing in my opinion. Maybe in evolution it was, but science is or equals observation. Since it has not been observed, it is not science. That is why evolution is still a theory.
No, it isn't. There may be living organisms in mud such as worms. Mud is only made from dirt and water.
In biological terms, a clone is a living thing. For example, Dolly the sheep was a clone, and clearly she was a living thing.
living
it was a dog
Probably bacteria. As is, the bacteria that cause diseases, and help with our immune system. That type of bacteria.
The First Beautiful Thing was created on 2010-01-15.
Last Thing I Needed First Thing This Morning was created in 1982-10.
No, a waterfall is not a living thing. It is a natural phenomenon created by the flow of water over rocks or a steep surface.
Animals were the first living thing in space.
The first living thing discovered in the Precambrian Era was the Cyanobacteria.
synthia
ozone
dog
No, it was a man.
One.