Chemical is one thing, life in another.
This body is for sure made of chemicals, but if we just this body then it should be very much possible to make a dead man alive by combination of the 'missing' chemical, but as we understand this is not true.
Lets make another logical point. Everyday around us, we see life coming from another life. For eg, a mother giving birth, an ant giving birth to an ant and so on.
We also see chemicals coming from life. For eg, our body releases chemicals life urine, blood, etc.
But! we Never see life coming from chemical!! Tell one example if you think there are (there are none).
The point is 'life' as we call it, is nothing but a spark of consciousness within each living being which is not made of chemical reaction. This is a waste of efforts from scientist who are following to create life from chemicals. Even the Big Bang theory is totally wrong, as it is based on unacceptable assumptions and no one thinks even a wee bit on whether those assumptions are worth the belief or not.
atmosphere
True
there are a lot of substances that wont preserve an organism. one would be molten rock under the earths crust or feathers something that cant keep it compact and still in one piece over millions of years.
energy
Partarxidia mou
the most important, the conversion of Carbon Di-oxide to Oxygen!
why do you think scientists study earths interior?if you were a scientists ,will you undertake a study of the earths interior?
an earthquake
why scientists use models to represent earths process
What are two ways that's scientists can study earths climates history
the
seismometers
scientist use models to show or explain easier
what involves both chemical and physical change on earths surface
it helps the scientists to predict future changes.
rocks and seismic waves
No. This has not occurred, yet.
When chemical weathering occurs on the rocks of earths surface, the earth lets out Phosphorus.Answer: Phosphorus