The idea of their experiment was to determine what kind of macromolecule was the genetic material, DNA or proteins. Bacteriophages, viruses that infect bacteria, were known to carry all of the information needed to make themselves, but using the genetic machinery of their hosts. Based on this, they were used as a simple system that should be governed by the same principals as the genetic information of the bacteria itself.
At the time it was known that nearly all phosphorus in macromolecules is found in nucleic acid, and nearly all sulfur is found in proteins (methionine and cycteine). So if you grow cells in radioactive isotopes of phosphorus, the nucleic acids (e.g. DNA) become radioactive, and if you grow cells in radioactive sulfur, proteins become radioactive.
Sorry, there's more. Folks studying infection of bacteria by phage found that most of the virus was a "package" that never entered the cell. So if they mixed phage with bacteria and waited 15 minutes and then put the mix in a blender for a few seconds, the packages that had been attached to the outside of the bacteria get ripped off and can be searated from the bacteria. While the packages are no longer attached to the bacteria, the bacteria are already infected, so the virus genes must already be inside.
Now the experiment: Hershey and Chase infected bacteria with phage with racdioactive proteins (sulfur) or in a separate experiment radioactive DNA (phosphorus). The bacteria was mixed with virus for 15 minutes, then whoosh, frappe! They then separated the bacteria from the viruses that had not infected bacteria and empty packages, and asked what kind of radioactive macromoleules were able to get inside the bacteria following the short incubation.
In the sulfur experiment , the bacteria were NOT radioactive so proteins appeared to not enter the bacteria during this short time frame. In the phosphorus experiment, the bacteria became radioactive after a short incubation, meaning the DNA of the phage had entered the bacteria in the same time frame as the genetic material. This was consistent with DNA being the genetic material of bacteriophage.
Louis Pasteur's experiment demonstrated that bacteria do not arise spontaneously in broth by showing that microorganisms only appeared in broth when exposed to air containing pre-existing microbes. He used swan-necked flasks to prevent airborne microbes from contaminating the broth while still allowing air to pass through, proving that the growth of bacteria came from existing microorganisms and not through spontaneous generation within the broth.
Yes, you can conduct a simple experiment using agar plates to show the presence of bacteria. You can swab a surface or sample, streak it onto an agar plate, incubate it for a few days, and observe the growth of bacterial colonies. This will demonstrate the presence of bacteria through visible growth on the agar plate.
In 1928, Frederick Griffith was able to transform harmless bacteria into virulent pathogens with an extract that Oswald Avery proved, in 1944, to be DNA. In 1952, Martha Chase and Alfred Hershey used radioactively labeled virus DNA to infect bacteria, proving the same point.
In their experiments, Hershey and Chase injected chemical tracers that resembled proteins and DNA into a type of rapidly reproducing virus called T2. They then tracked the course of the tracers as they made their way through reproduction and found that the tracers that resembled DNA were much more likely than the tracers that resembled proteins to be found in future generations of the cells. Hershey and Chase concluded that DNA, and not protein, was associated with genetic material.
No, bacteria do not go through photosynthesis to obtain energy. Instead, they obtain energy through processes such as fermentation or respiration.
The genetic mateial is made of DNA and not of proteins
The genetic mateial is made of DNA and not of proteins
Hershey and Chase knew that bacteriophages infect bacteria by injecting their DNA into the host cell. This led them to use bacteriophages in their DNA experiment to confirm that DNA, not protein, is the genetic material responsible for heredity. By radioactively labeling the DNA and proteins of the virus, they were able to trace the genetic material through the infection process.
They knew traits were inherited, but did not know why.
I am not entirely sure about "surprising" but his experiment showed that bacteria can transfer genetic information through a process known as transformation.
Frederick Griffith introduced the Griffith experiment in 1928. This experiment proved that bacteria can carry genetic information through a process called transformation.
- A series of experiments conducted in 1952 by Alfred Hershey and Martha Chase confirming that DNA was the genetic material in cells - The experiment was conducted using T2 phage; a virus that infects bacteria. They do so by attaching to the surface of a bacterium and injecting its genetic material into the bacteria. The structure had recently been elucidated by electron microscopy. - The 1st experiment- Phage DNA was labeled with radioactive 32P. Phosphorous is an important component of DNA which is not found in Amino Acids; protein building blocks. - The phages were allowed to infect E.coli bacteria and through a series of elegant experiments they were able to observe transfer of labeled phage DNA into the cytoplasm of the bacteria. - In the second experiment, they labeled phages with radioactive Sulfur 35 which is found in amino acids cysteine and Methionine. After infection of E.coli, they sheared off the phage protein shells from the infected cells using high speed blender and centrifugation to separate. - After centrifugation, the radioactive sulfur was found in the protein portion confirming the hypothesis that the genetic information transferred was DNA and not protein
The first major experiment that led the discovery of DNA as the genetic material was performed by Griffith and Avery. They studied 2 strains of bacteria "Streptococcus Pneumonia, which causes pneumonia. They found that one strain could be transformed into other forms of bacteria and germs.
Louis Pasteur's experiment demonstrated that bacteria do not arise spontaneously in broth by showing that microorganisms only appeared in broth when exposed to air containing pre-existing microbes. He used swan-necked flasks to prevent airborne microbes from contaminating the broth while still allowing air to pass through, proving that the growth of bacteria came from existing microorganisms and not through spontaneous generation within the broth.
Milton Hershey and Alfred Hershey are not directly related but share a common connection through their contributions to the chocolate industry. Milton Hershey was the founder of the Hershey Chocolate Company, while Alfred Hershey was a notable American bacteriologist and geneticist known for his work with bacteriophages and was not involved in the chocolate business. Their shared last name is coincidental, and their legacies are in different fields.
Yes, you can conduct a simple experiment using agar plates to show the presence of bacteria. You can swab a surface or sample, streak it onto an agar plate, incubate it for a few days, and observe the growth of bacterial colonies. This will demonstrate the presence of bacteria through visible growth on the agar plate.
In 1928, Frederick Griffith was able to transform harmless bacteria into virulent pathogens with an extract that Oswald Avery proved, in 1944, to be DNA. In 1952, Martha Chase and Alfred Hershey used radioactively labeled virus DNA to infect bacteria, proving the same point.