0
Science generally supports the theory of evolution, which explains the development of life on Earth through natural selection and genetic variation over millions of years. The Big Bang theory is widely accepted among scientists as the most plausible explanation for the origin of the universe.
What else can I help you with?
Has Science disproved the Creation story?
Yes. Creation is a story while evolution is science. The two can really never explain each other. You can not use science to explain any fairy tales.Creationists do think that their story does explain things.Answer:No, of course not. As the above answer states, the two cannot explain each other. Science cannot prove that God didn't create the Universe. A significant percentage of scientists believe in God as the creator and the agent of evolution, or without evolution.Answer:Just because some scientists believe in god, it doesn't mean that they believe in creation stories. The argument that because they believe in god must mean that they don't believe in evolution is illogical. And a creationist would first have to prove god exists and explain god's origins.
What is it called if you believe in a higher power but also believe in evolution?
It is called being religious (Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, etc according to which higher power you believe in) while, at the same time, accepting the facts of science. Many Christians, for example, do just that - believe in evolution.For more information about religion and evolution, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What might a creationist believe?
A Creationist might believe in a literal understanding of Genesis including its Creation-narrative. See also:Is there evidence against EvolutionCan you show that God existsGod's wisdom seen in His creationsDiscovering Creation
What are facts about creationism?
In creation God created the heavens and the earth. Some people believe in evolution but think about it. Do you believe earth was made because of random disorders or because something bigger than us with power created it?
Do any qualified scientists support the creation theory?
Prior to reading the answers below, it is perhaps important to note that there is no 'creation theory'. There are various religious creation myths, but no comprehensive and robust scientific model that has any explanatory or predictive power.Answer: Quite a few scientists support creation theory. This places them out of step with the mainstream scientists who believe in autobiogenesis, or a spontaneous origin of life, coupled with evolution. As Richard Dawkins put it "It is a monumental disagreement. One side or the other has got to be wrong, and not just slightly wrong but catastrophically, ignominiously, disastrously wrong."Prior to the 20th Century, most scientists believed in Creation.Today, there are numerous organizations of scientists who support creation theory: Answers in Genesis ; Creation Research, Science Education Foundation; Institute for Creation Research; The Creation SuperLibrary and others. Some publish peer-reviewed journals, such as the Creation Research Society's CRS Journal and the Journal of Creation by Creation Ministries International (The Australian arm of Answers in Genesis).Answer While it is true that many "scientists" disagree with evolution in favor of creationism, that number drops significantly when you consider only those who study nature or life, and is almost non-existent when you consider only those with expertise in fields like biology, paleontology, geology or astronomy - the above list may seem impressive, but it is out of well over a hundred thousand PhD scientists alive today. Now it's also important to note that many scientists believe in some sort of god or creator, but are not creationists. Creationism generally refers to strict 6-day creation fundamentalism or the movement to teach that there is a god in science classes in public schools. About 60% of scientists believe in a personal god, many believe this god created life indirectly, which can be considered a different sort of creationism. Meanwhile about 99.85% of earth and life scientists (those same scientists who mostly believe in a personal god) accept evolution as well.Answer Yes, quite a few actually. Many scientists and researchers have come to support the creation theory because as they study 'Creation -vs- Evolution' they have found that there are more 'holes' in the evolution theory than there are in 'Creation'.Both Creationism and Evolution start with presuppositions. Evolution starts with the presupposition that God, if He exists, played no part in the development of species, but that they developed by macro-evolution or chance mutations that resulted in benefit to the organisms; Creationism presumes that He created all species, and that there are minor adaptions which occur naturally, called micro-evolution.
When was Creation Science Movement created?
Creation Science Movement was created in 1932.
Science about the creation?
There is no science about creation. Creation is an unfounded myth with absolutely no evidence to support it. Try asking about evolution instead.
Has Science disproved the Creation story?
Yes. Creation is a story while evolution is science. The two can really never explain each other. You can not use science to explain any fairy tales.Creationists do think that their story does explain things.Answer:No, of course not. As the above answer states, the two cannot explain each other. Science cannot prove that God didn't create the Universe. A significant percentage of scientists believe in God as the creator and the agent of evolution, or without evolution.Answer:Just because some scientists believe in god, it doesn't mean that they believe in creation stories. The argument that because they believe in god must mean that they don't believe in evolution is illogical. And a creationist would first have to prove god exists and explain god's origins.
What do Christians believe about using science ot help us?
Christians generally believe that science is a valuable tool that can help us understand the world and improve our lives. They see science as a way to discover more about God's creation and to further appreciate His wisdom and design. Many Christians also believe that using science to help others is a way to fulfill their mandate to love and serve their neighbors.
Why should creation in science not be taught in science?
Creationism is not science, and to teach it in science classes would be misleading. For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
When was Big Valley Creation Science Museum created?
Big Valley Creation Science Museum was created on 2007-06-05.
God vs Science?
There is no God versus science, they are married at the deepest level. God created everything. Science is just the tool that we use to figure out the method God used to create. The majority of scientists believe in God by the proofs they've seen in creation.
How was science used in the creation of the SUV?
There was absolutely no science used in the creation of the SUV. On the eighth day, God said "Let there be SUV", and there was SUV.
What has the author Glenn Gates Cole written?
Glenn Gates Cole has written: 'Creation and science' -- subject(s): Bible, Bible and science, Creation, Criticism, interpretation, Religion and science
Is god fictious?
I do not believe that God is fictitious; if he was, then where did all the amazing design, that science has proven exists, come from? The detail in 'creation' points to someone having a hand in how this world was formed
What has the author Frank Lewis Marsh written?
Frank Lewis Marsh has written: 'Evolution, creation and science' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Evolution, Creation
Is the concept of using the fictional drug CPH4 real, or is it purely a creation of science fiction?
The fictional drug CPH4 is not real and is purely a creation of science fiction.
