Fossils, Similarities in early development, and similar body structures
Indirect evidence in evolution refers to evidence that supports a particular evolutionary hypothesis through inference rather than direct observation. This can include fossil records, comparative anatomy, embryology, and molecular biology studies that provide clues about the relationships between different species and how they have evolved over time. This type of evidence helps scientists piece together the history and patterns of evolution.
Fossil records, anatomical similarities among different species, and the observation of natural selection in action were some of the key pieces of evidence used to support the idea of evolution when it was first proposed.
Rather both. Evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is an observed and observable fact. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains this fact with overwhelming evidences from many different disciplines.
Evidence for evolution includes the fossil record, comparative anatomy, molecular biology, and observed instances of natural selection. These different lines of evidence all support the concept of biological evolution occurring over time.
For a scientist to argue that evolution does not exist based on DNA evidence, her findings would need to demonstrate that genetic mutations do not occur, that species do not share common ancestry, and that there is no evidence of natural selection influencing genetic variation over time. This would contradict the vast body of scientific evidence supporting the theory of evolution.
I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org
Perhaps not, but evolution can exist without natural selection.
It is not a matter of agreement, it is a matter of accepting the overwhelming evidences in support of the theory of evolution by natural selection.
Because evolution does not exist and never did exist.
Climate, and landforms
none.
yeah yeah sure sure
According to the theory of evolution, yes, cavemen probably did exist.
Biological "de-evolution" does not exist. Evolution does not require an increment of complexity, as losing unnecessary adaptions is also evolution.
no because evolution doesn't exist
The vast majority of scientists support evolution. There is no longer any debate in the scientific community about whether evolution occurs, only the mechanisms in which evolution acts upon is debated.
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.