Pesticides.
Pests that affect human health and crops are a major problem.
However, one possible consequence of using pesticides is that beneficial
organisms living in the same environment as the pests could also be
harmed. This can happen because many pesticides kill more than just
the pest. For example, the lygus bug are pest that feeds
on alfalfa and canola plants and causes severe damage to these crops.
However, pesticides that are sprayed to kill lygus bugs also kill bees.
Another downside to using pesticides is that they can also harm the
beneficial insects that normally prey on the pests. This can result in
the populations of pests actually increasing because there are fewer
organisms to prey on them!
Biological control.
Another way to control insect pests is to use their natural enemies.
This method, called biological control, can be very effective and limits
or eliminates the need for pesticides. For example, leafy spurge is a
weed that was accidentally introduced into Canada in the late 1800s . Leafy spurge grows faster than naturally occurring
pasture grasses. Cattle will not eat leafy spurge, so land that is infested
with this weed cannot carry livestock. The black dot spurge beetle is a
small beetle that feeds on leafy spurge. The beetle was introduced into Alberta in 1983, and has been very successful in
controlling the spread of leafy spurge. Desirable plants, such as pasture
and rangeland grasses, are returning to the areas where leafy spurge
used to grow. Although biological control can work very well, there can be risks.
Whenever a new organism that is not native to the area is introduced
to an ecosystem, there is always a risk that it will cause harm.
A farmer might choose biological control over chemical pesticides to minimize negative impacts on the environment and human health, reduce chemical residues on produce, and promote sustainable agricultural practices. Biological control methods also have the potential for long-term pest management and are often more target-specific.
Some biological alternatives to chemical pesticides include introducing natural predators or parasites to control pest populations, using insecticidal soaps or oils derived from plants, and planting trap crops to attract pests away from main crops. Crop rotation and intercropping with pest-repellent plants can also help reduce the need for chemical pesticides.
Biological control involves using natural enemies of pests, such as predators or pathogens, to keep pest populations in check. Genetic modification can be used to engineer crops that are resistant to pests, reducing the need for chemical control methods. These approaches can be more environmentally friendly and sustainable than using pesticides and herbicides.
Biological pest control involves using living organisms, such as predators, parasites, or pathogens, to control pest populations in an environmentally friendly way. These natural enemies help to manage pest populations by either killing the pests directly or interfering with their reproductive cycle. Biological control can be a sustainable and effective alternative to chemical pesticides.
In chemical control some kind of chemical is the killing agent, while in biological control the killing agent is a live organism. It may be a predetor or a bacteria or a paracite or fungi. While the definition is simple there is a multitude of implications. A chemical may be long lasting or degradable, but it never thinks nor can it reproduce. Both can have side effects which at times cause more damage then the original pest/disease they were meant to treat does.
* Organic agriculture actually organic farming does use pesticides, what you're looking for is "biological control" which means it allows the use of synthetic fertilizers but trades chemical pest control with biological pest control. in biological control one applies parasitic wasps, entomophagic fungie and other such agents in much the same way one would apply chemical pesticides.
Biological control is the use of a pey species to control pests and parasites i.e. to use Encarsia formosa the Chalcid wasp to control Whitefly. This avoids the use of pesticides.
A farmer might choose biological control over chemical pesticides to minimize negative impacts on the environment and human health, reduce chemical residues on produce, and promote sustainable agricultural practices. Biological control methods also have the potential for long-term pest management and are often more target-specific.
Some biological alternatives to chemical pesticides include introducing natural predators or parasites to control pest populations, using insecticidal soaps or oils derived from plants, and planting trap crops to attract pests away from main crops. Crop rotation and intercropping with pest-repellent plants can also help reduce the need for chemical pesticides.
difference between feedback and control
Biological control involves using natural enemies of pests, such as predators or pathogens, to keep pest populations in check. Genetic modification can be used to engineer crops that are resistant to pests, reducing the need for chemical control methods. These approaches can be more environmentally friendly and sustainable than using pesticides and herbicides.
Biological pest control involves using living organisms, such as predators, parasites, or pathogens, to control pest populations in an environmentally friendly way. These natural enemies help to manage pest populations by either killing the pests directly or interfering with their reproductive cycle. Biological control can be a sustainable and effective alternative to chemical pesticides.
Reducing monoculture, crop rotation, biological controls, the production of biodegradable pesticides and genetically engineering plants to produce their own pesticides are some solutions to biological magnification. Education about the impact of pesticides on the ecosystem and human health is also important.
Mechanical means using machinery whereas biological means using another form of life to control the weed. Biological way is Eco-friendly. Go Bio whenever possible!
In chemical control some kind of chemical is the killing agent, while in biological control the killing agent is a live organism. It may be a predetor or a bacteria or a paracite or fungi. While the definition is simple there is a multitude of implications. A chemical may be long lasting or degradable, but it never thinks nor can it reproduce. Both can have side effects which at times cause more damage then the original pest/disease they were meant to treat does.
Biological control of pests involves using natural enemies such as predators, parasites, or pathogens to manage pest populations. This method is a sustainable and environmentally-friendly approach to pest management that can help reduce the need for chemical pesticides. Biological control can help maintain ecological balance and is often used in integrated pest management programs.
The only difference - is that the organic cotton has been grown without the use of artificial pesticides etc. Farmers have used natural products (eg natural fertilizers) to aid growth, and using other insects to keep pests under control rather than use manufactured pesticides.