The endosymbiotic hypothesis postulates that an early eukaryotic cells lacking mitochondria and chloroplasts phagocytosed early aerobic prokaryotes and photosynthetic prokaryotes and rather than
The endosymbiotic theory is widely accepted as a strong scientific hypothesis; however, definitive proof is challenging due to the lack of direct observational evidence from billions of years ago when the theorized events occurred. While there is substantial supporting evidence, such as the similarities between organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts with free-living bacteria, the theory cannot be definitively proven beyond any doubt.
Apex: conclusion
This statement is correct because a hypothesis is a proposed explanation that has not been validated through experimentation and evidence. Scientific inquiry aims to test and gather evidence to support or reject a hypothesis, rather than proving it true. It is always possible for new evidence or data to emerge that could challenge or refine a hypothesis.
You are supposed to assume/expect that nothing happens, or the norm happens. E.g. if you are testing if plants grow more in light, you assume they dont, then see if that expectation is consistent with the result.
The hypothesis is supported by data from previous research studies, observational data, and controlled experiments. This data may include statistical analyses, graphs, tables, findings from literature reviews, and expert opinions. Additionally, the hypothesis may be supported by correlations, significant p-values, and reproducible results from multiple studies.
They arose from a symbiotic union of two organisms.
The endosymbiotic theory is widely accepted as a strong scientific hypothesis; however, definitive proof is challenging due to the lack of direct observational evidence from billions of years ago when the theorized events occurred. While there is substantial supporting evidence, such as the similarities between organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts with free-living bacteria, the theory cannot be definitively proven beyond any doubt.
They are thought to be evolved from photosynthetic bacteria. They have circular DNA and 70s ribosomes as bacteria
The evidence that made you come to that conclusion. Remember that a hypothesis is an educated guess
Yes, hypotheses should be supported by evidence to be considered valid. Evidence helps to confirm or refute the hypothesis, guiding further research and understanding of the subject. In scientific inquiry, robust evidence strengthens the credibility of the hypothesis and contributes to the development of knowledge. Ultimately, without evidence, a hypothesis remains speculative and unsubstantiated.
when there s proof to back it up with evidence or an experiment to test the hypothesis
hypothesis
Lynn Margulis was the scientist who proposed and championed the endosymbiotic theory. She provided evidence to support the idea that eukaryotic cells evolved from symbiotic relationships between different prokaryotic organisms.
Apex: conclusion
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
Hypothesis.
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.