Charles Darwin was seeking to explain the patterns of biodiversity he observed during his travels, particularly how different species had evolved over time and adapted to their environments. He wanted to understand the mechanisms driving these changes, leading to the development of his theory of natural selection as a process for evolution.
A solution is a means of solving a problem or dealing with a difficult situation. It is a way to resolve an issue or achieve a desired outcome.
The microscope was created to magnify tiny objects that are invisible to the naked eye, thus allowing scientists to study and understand the microscopic world. It solved the problem of not being able to see and examine small details, enabling important discoveries in biology, medicine, and other fields.
Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin, the first antibiotic drug, which revolutionized medicine by treating bacterial infections effectively. This discovery helped solve the societal problem of infections and diseases that previously had high mortality rates. Penicillin played a crucial role in saving many lives and improving public health worldwide.
To solve a Hardy-Weinberg problem, you need to use the formula p2 2pq q2 1, where p and q represent the frequencies of two alleles in a population. First, determine the allele frequencies using the given information. Then, use the formula to calculate the expected genotype frequencies. Compare the expected and observed genotype frequencies to determine if the population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Technically and generally speaking scientists do not work to solve problems, but to uncover how the universe works. For example a biologist seeks to understand how living beings/tissues/cells work, not to solve any particular problem. Of course the knowledge thus generated can be then used to solve particular practical problems. But a a physicist is a scientist, an engineer is not.The scientific method employed by scientists to solve the problem of insufficient understanding of the laws of the universe can be applied to (try to) solve any problem. It goes like this:Identify the problem - this step must end with a very clear and objective definition of the problemCome up with a theory/solutionTest via experiments if said theory/solution fits well with reality. Reality never confirms a theory, ever. Any experiment has only a chance of proving the theory wrong. The more experiments you run without any of them disproving your theory, the more likely it is your theory is correct.If your experiment has proven your theory incorrect, you repeat steps 2,3 with a new theory until you find one that withstands all the tests and experiments you can think of.It is very important to note that although science solves many problems practically (for given situations), it can never be proven scientifically that a certain solution will work in any situation or that a problem is permanently solved by science for all possible circumstances. A scientific theory is never final as opposed to other knowledge creation method such as religious revelation which may claim to be complete and final.The core of the scientific method lies in not making any assumptions and testing everything that comes to mind. It consists not so much in what you do (trying various things), but in what you do not do, namely that you do not assume any theory to be perfect; you continue to test your solution against all sorts of different situations and adapt it if necessary.
There is no fire wood problem and the government isn't trying to solve it.
Historians solve many different problems; there is no "key problem"
They keep trying!
binding things together
guessing
it is a prediction at what you think will be the outcome of the experiment...
clearly define th problem they are trying to solve
milling grain, as the name implies.
When trying to solve a problem, it's helpful to ask questions like: What is the root cause of the problem? Who is affected by it, and how? What are the potential solutions, and what are their pros and cons? Additionally, asking what resources or constraints we have can guide the decision-making process effectively.
True (APEX)
Basically why do people ask questions that are of little use to the world.
how to get tasks completed that need to be done.