Fossils show the past history,
bacteria and viruses show that it's still active.
Indirect evidence in evolution refers to evidence that supports a particular evolutionary hypothesis through inference rather than direct observation. This can include fossil records, comparative anatomy, embryology, and molecular biology studies that provide clues about the relationships between different species and how they have evolved over time. This type of evidence helps scientists piece together the history and patterns of evolution.
Inductive reasoning was used in the development of the theory of evolution. Scientists observed patterns in the natural world, collected data from various sources, and then formulated hypotheses based on these observations. Over time, as more evidence was gathered, the theory of evolution was refined and confirmed through further experimentation and observation.
1. The carriage bolt is a type of bolt that was previously used in the construction of carriages. 2. The cream bun is a type of pastry very popular in Hong Kong and the Netherlands. 3. Emotional abuse is a type of domestic violence. 4. A skene is a type of theater found in ancient Greece. 5. A human is a type of ape.
Inductive reasoning was primarily used in the development of the theory of evolution. Scientists collected and analyzed data from various observations in nature to formulate general principles and make hypotheses about the process of evolution. By studying patterns and evidence, researchers were able to draw logical conclusions about how species change over time.
Some would call that microevolution. I would not. Some divide evolution into micro and macro. Evolutionary biologists prefer to use the terms evolution and speciation.
You could never get any type of evidence to prove untrue things...
Maybe the depth of oceans
Indirect evidence in evolution refers to evidence that supports a particular evolutionary hypothesis through inference rather than direct observation. This can include fossil records, comparative anatomy, embryology, and molecular biology studies that provide clues about the relationships between different species and how they have evolved over time. This type of evidence helps scientists piece together the history and patterns of evolution.
The COURT doesn't decide to hear a case based on evidence, the evidence only needs to convince the Prosecutor that a crime occurred, then HE brings the case to court for prosecution.
I have no ide that’s the answer
He uses proof to show the evidence is relevant
He uses proof to show the evidence is relevant
Cuvier was a proponent of catastrophism. Not so much a theory of evolution as an " explanation " of where all the fossil evidence that was being found then came from. Curvier posited that a series of catastrophes to the whole earth happened and every time they happened god repopulated the world with newer type organisms. Totally baseless and refuted by the evidence.
The similarity in DNA sequences between whales and ungulates is an example of genetic evidence for evolution, specifically molecular homology. This suggests that both groups share a common ancestor, supporting the theory of evolution by demonstrating how species can diverge from a common lineage over time. Such genetic similarities reflect the evolutionary relationships and the modifications that occur in different environments.
The type of evolution described is gradualism, which suggests that change occurs slowly and steadily over time, as proposed by Darwin. This concept is supported by evidence from the fossil record, which shows a gradual transition from one species to another.
Mitsubishi evolution would destroy a type s
A witness can bring in character evidence of their good character when their character is relevant to the case, such as when their credibility is being challenged. This type of evidence can be used to show the witness's reputation for honesty or truthfulness.