Incomplete dominance
no the do not chromosomes assort independently
dominat mark are special primers which are required to amplify homozygous alleles while codominant markers are required to identify heterozygous nature of an individual.
codominant
Recessive
genes can be codominant for example in blood groups a person can be A,B,AB or O. neither A nor B is more or less dominant than each other but they are dominant over O. there are many other types of dominance/recessive relationships in genes. you could look up epistasis on wikipedia to get a better idea of the bigger picture.
codominant alleles
To the best of my knowledge it is NOT codominant, but rather a simple autosomal recessive disorder. It may also be considered intermediate inheritance (a.k.a. incomplete dominance or overdominance) as heterozygotes are to an extent deficient in normal haemoglobin A production, only they usually do not show any clinical symptoms (and are protected from malaria as a bonus).
Codominant.
POLYGENIC!
A cross between two dominant homozygotes may produce a codominant animal.
no the do not chromosomes assort independently
No, autosomal recessive
codominant
codominant
dominat mark are special primers which are required to amplify homozygous alleles while codominant markers are required to identify heterozygous nature of an individual.
yes but the mans genes are shown more in the child is that your question cause i might be totaly wrong. ---- Genes from each parent show equally and codominant alleles produces a interleaved pattern rather than a blended pattern like incomplete dominance genes.
Which statement describes the blood type of a person with the alleles IAi? It is type AB because I and i are codominant. It is type AB because A and i are codominant. It is type A because i is dominant and A is recessive. It is type A because A is dominant and i is recessive.