If biomass is used at a faster rate than it is produced, there would be a depletion of biomass resources leading to potential resource shortage and ecosystem disruption. This could result in habitat loss, soil erosion, and a decrease in biodiversity, affecting both the environment and the economy in the long term. Efforts to promote sustainable biomass management practices would be crucial to prevent such negative impacts.
The biomass of a tertiary consumer would be smaller than the biomass of a primary consumer. This is because energy is lost as it moves up the food chain through each trophic level. Tertiary consumers have less available energy and biomass compared to primary consumers.
Tropical rainforests typically have the biggest biomass due to the high levels of vegetation and diversity of plant and animal species that contribute to the overall biomass.
productivity
Biomass would be higher in a rainforest due to the abundant plant life and vegetation that thrives in the moist environment, leading to a greater accumulation of organic matter. Deserts, on the other hand, have low biomass levels due to the scarcity of water and limited plant growth.
Biomass density is the term defined as the amount of biomass in a given area, typically measured in terms of weight (e.g., grams per square meter) or volume (e.g., cubic meters per hectare). It provides insights into the productivity and health of an ecosystem.
It's days would be shorter
It would be May.
biomass is not cheap..biomass would cost almost twice as much on average as gas or coal-fired electricity.
It would oscillate faster.
If the ozone was being made at faster rate, nothing would happen. The UV would control that rate.
There wouldn't be no energy produced in the cell.
it would grow at a faster rate then a normal seed
Would we need a few more hours in the day
No food will be produced. So no energy will be produced
23,934 hours
Burning biomass is considered better than burning oil or coal because biomass is a renewable energy source that can be produced sustainably, whereas oil and coal are fossil fuels that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Additionally, burning biomass can help reduce waste by using organic materials that would otherwise be disposed of in landfills.
a nonrenewable biomass would be burning word or cutting down trees.