Nothing. There is a misconception that there is an energetic cycle in an ecosystems but that is erroneous. There is a cycle in nitrogen and other nutrients that decomposers engender and, eventually, plants absorb but there is zero energy content in those as plants take 100 of the energy from the sun. The purport of decomposers is to return nutrients to the soil, not energy.
Energy only flows in one direction in the biological world starting and getting dispersed out by the different biological organisms until is thoroughly lost to the entropy in the universe. A decomposer is yet another organism that consumes the energy amassed by the plants from the sun and disperses it out.
If decomposers were removed from a habitat, dead organic matter would not be broken down and recycled back into the ecosystem. This would lead to a buildup of dead material, decreased nutrient availability for plants, and disruption of energy flow within the ecosystem. Overall, it would have a negative impact on the health and balance of the ecosystem.
If there are no decomposers, dead organic matter would not be broken down and recycled. This would lead to a buildup of dead material, nutrient depletion in the soil, and hamper the growth of new plants. The ecosystem would become unbalanced and eventually collapse.
Decomposers are an essential component of any ecosystem. Their main role is to recycle nutrients in dead organisms and their wastes. Most decomposers are bacteria and fungi. Without the decomposers, there could be no life, since plants would then run out of nutrients.
Decomposers break down dead organic matter, such as fallen leaves and animal remains, into simpler compounds. This process releases nutrients back into the ecosystem, making them available for plants and other organisms. Without decomposers, nutrients would be locked up in dead matter and unavailable for recycling, leading to nutrient depletion in the ecosystem.
caus eit is
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
If there was no decomposers in an ecosystem then all the remains and waste of animals and plants would be lying around for there would be no decompostiton of that waste. Also, if there was no decomposers then none of that natural nutrients can be returned back to the ecosystem.
If all the decomposers in an ecosystem were destroyed then the ecosystem would all apart. This is because they give the nutrients back to the soil in order for new organisms to grow.
If decomposers were removed from a habitat, dead organic matter would not be broken down and recycled back into the ecosystem. This would lead to a buildup of dead material, decreased nutrient availability for plants, and disruption of energy flow within the ecosystem. Overall, it would have a negative impact on the health and balance of the ecosystem.
If all the decomposers were to die, there would be no organic nutrients and all the dead plants would ruin the animals' habitat; the ecosystem would be filled with plant and animal waste, and there would be no decomposition of waste material.
plant growth would be affected.
nothing it depends on what factor was removed
the fishes and seals will increased
If there are no decomposers, dead plant and animal matter would not be broken down and recycled back into the ecosystem. This would lead to a buildup of organic material, resource competition, nutrient deficiencies, and ultimately ecosystem collapse. The cycle of nutrients would be disrupted, negatively impacting the balance of the ecosystem.
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)