Nothing. There is a misconception that there is an energetic cycle in an ecosystems but that is erroneous. There is a cycle in nitrogen and other nutrients that decomposers engender and, eventually, plants absorb but there is zero energy content in those as plants take 100 of the energy from the sun. The purport of decomposers is to return nutrients to the soil, not energy.
Energy only flows in one direction in the biological world starting and getting dispersed out by the different biological organisms until is thoroughly lost to the entropy in the universe. A decomposer is yet another organism that consumes the energy amassed by the plants from the sun and disperses it out.
There would be no organic nutrients and all the dead plants would ruin the animals habitat.The ecosystem will be fill by plants and animal wastes as there will be no decompositon of waste material.
.
scavengers help in eating the remains after a predator has enjoyed and before the decompose rs unhunger themselves
Then all things that are bio-degradeable would still be laying around the earth. causing it to overcrowd then we would just be living in a total wasteland of grabage :)
If decomposers and detritus feeders were to be eliminated in an ecosystem, one consequence would be that plants would lack nutrients. There would also be an accumulation of dead material.
The world would be covered in dead bodies of humans and animals, plant remains and lots of other bad things.
It would die
dis nuts
there would be a decrease of carbon dioxide available to the ecosystem
Things would break down extremely slowly (mostly from ultraviolet and abrasion), much like what happens today with most plastic.
Decomposers are an essential component of any ecosystem. Their main role is to recycle nutrients in dead organisms and their wastes. Most decomposers are bacteria and fungi. Without the decomposers, there could be no life, since plants would then run out of nutrients.
it will go down shellfish can not go on land and survive
The organic detritus that only decomposers such as fungi can break down would fill the world with a mass so large organisms would be competing with dead organic matter for space to live. Think of all the dead trees over the eons that decomposers have recycled back into the system.
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
if all the decomposers were removed the fertility would wouldnt grow :)
If all the decomposers in an ecosystem were destroyed then the ecosystem would all apart. This is because they give the nutrients back to the soil in order for new organisms to grow.
If there was no decomposers in an ecosystem then all the remains and waste of animals and plants would be lying around for there would be no decompostiton of that waste. Also, if there was no decomposers then none of that natural nutrients can be returned back to the ecosystem.
If the producers were removed then there would be no beginning to the food chain and the complete ecosystem would die off. If the detrivores and decomposers were removed there would be no organic nutrients and all the dead plants would ruin the animals habitat.The ecosystem will be fill by plants and animal wastes as there will be no decompositon of waste material. .
If all the decomposers were to die, there would be no organic nutrients and all the dead plants would ruin the animals' habitat; the ecosystem would be filled with plant and animal waste, and there would be no decomposition of waste material.
plant growth would be affected.
the fishes and seals will increased
nothing it depends on what factor was removed
The eosystem would have less decomposers .
there would be a decrease of carbon dioxide available to the ecosystem