RNA likely came first in the evolution of life before DNA. RNA is thought to have been an early molecule that played a crucial role in the development of life on Earth.
DNA came first before RNA in the evolution of life on Earth. DNA is considered to be the genetic material that stores and transmits genetic information, while RNA plays a crucial role in protein synthesis and other cellular processes.
No, Darwin did not have knowledge of DNA when he proposed his theory of evolution. DNA was not discovered until after Darwin's time, in the 20th century. Darwin's theory of evolution was based on observations of natural selection and the variation and adaptation of species over time.
Currently, scientists believe that RNA likely came first in evolution before DNA. This is because RNA is more versatile and can store genetic information, catalyze reactions, and replicate itself, making it a prime candidate for the earliest stages of life.
DNA provides greater stability and accuracy in storing genetic information compared to RNA. This makes DNA less prone to errors and mutations, allowing for more efficient replication and inheritance of genetic material. This likely led to the switch to DNA-based genetic systems during evolution on Earth.
An organism with DNA could be alive because it exhibits the fundamental sign of life: the ability to replicate and pass on genetic information to subsequent generations. This process allows for the adaptation and evolution of the organism over time.
DNA came first before RNA in the evolution of life on Earth. DNA is considered to be the genetic material that stores and transmits genetic information, while RNA plays a crucial role in protein synthesis and other cellular processes.
DNA evolution aka 'Jogress evolution' came from Digimon Adventure 02.
In order to have DNA, you have to have 20 critical protiens for DNA to form. These proteins can only be derived from present DNA. This evidence points towards Creation rather than evolution.
scientist prove that a chicken came first not the egg because of DNA
Yes, evolution is closely related to DNA. Changes in DNA, such as mutations, are the raw material for evolution by natural selection. Over time, these changes can accumulate and lead to the development of new species through the process of evolution.
The genographic project analyzes human DNA to learn about where we came from. It also helps to show us our origin and prove the theories of Darwin and evolution.
nothing
DNA
DNA
DNA I think
Biology is the study of life and its processes (cells: mitochondria, lysosomes, etc; genetics: DNA/RNA; evolution, and more).
Answer:Abiogenesis concerns the origin or start of life. There is currently no generally accepted theory for abiogenesis. There is an RNA world hypothesis, in which RNA was the dominant self replicating molecule before DNA took over. There are also a few other theories. But evolution itself does not incorporate abiogenesis (at this time).Instead, evolution answers how the diversification of life came about. Darwin was himself unaware of the role genes played in evolution--his work dealt strictly with the non random survival of of randomly varying offspring. But genetics has vastly improved our understanding of the route evolution took.An Answer:This is my opinion. Man, in order to feel in control of his life and surroundings, feels that he must be able to explain everything. The theory of evolution gives some people the feeling that all is well because life has an explaination.