Which of what?
A mutation is a permanent change in the DNA sequence of a gene. This can be beneficial if the change gives a new function to or improves the function of that gene. The above is a definition. But one must really define "beneficial". Some regard it as beneficial if it helps the specific individual who has it. Others would think it beneficial if it produced some survival advantage that insured more descendents for that individual. It is the difference between a mutation that allowed for greater athletic ability, but a decreased desire for offspring, versus a more moderate athletic enhancement, but a greater desire for offspring. The small percentage of ways to improve an organism, versus the near infinite ways of harming the organism, mean that most mutations are not going to be beneficial. At best, they will be "inconsequential" - such as a new shade of eye color, or a mole on a section of your skin. The populist notion of "powers" that can come from mutations is wildly inaccurate. Even assuming a minor power like the ability to see infra red radiation would take thousands upon thousands of mutations over vast amounts of time. A mutation for blindness is far more likely. It should also be noted that the traditional model of evolutionary theory no longer applies to man. We don't allow changes in our environment, and without such changes, there is no need for one trait more than another to predominate. After all, it is irrelevent that a mutation might allow for greater speed in running, when everyone drives a car.
Unicellular best describes a one celled organism.
Adaptation allows the organism to become best suited for its environment!
Mutation in fruit flies
paramecium
A trait that is beneficial to survival.
The organism moves to different levels in the wet mount.
Mutation in it self, serves as the way a species adapts. Mutations can be natural or man-made/influenced. "The strong survive" that is the most important thing about mutation. But for a species to adapt it is necessary to have a diverse genetic population. When the environment changes the part of the population best adapted to the new circumstances propagate and survive best. But in general a member of a species is often able to adapt its genetics to an environmental situation. For example when people who live on sea level move to higher regions, then in a few generations the people adapt to the new environment (thinner air, less oxygen). These changes can be genetic, but not necessarily the product of evolution.
A mutation is a permanent change in the DNA sequence of a gene. This can be beneficial if the change gives a new function to or improves the function of that gene. The above is a definition. But one must really define "beneficial". Some regard it as beneficial if it helps the specific individual who has it. Others would think it beneficial if it produced some survival advantage that insured more descendents for that individual. It is the difference between a mutation that allowed for greater athletic ability, but a decreased desire for offspring, versus a more moderate athletic enhancement, but a greater desire for offspring. The small percentage of ways to improve an organism, versus the near infinite ways of harming the organism, mean that most mutations are not going to be beneficial. At best, they will be "inconsequential" - such as a new shade of eye color, or a mole on a section of your skin. The populist notion of "powers" that can come from mutations is wildly inaccurate. Even assuming a minor power like the ability to see infra red radiation would take thousands upon thousands of mutations over vast amounts of time. A mutation for blindness is far more likely. It should also be noted that the traditional model of evolutionary theory no longer applies to man. We don't allow changes in our environment, and without such changes, there is no need for one trait more than another to predominate. After all, it is irrelevent that a mutation might allow for greater speed in running, when everyone drives a car.
gene expression can be influed by the environment
"Buying is a personal investment while renting involves giving money to the landlord"
The Coriolis effect best explains why fluid is deflected.
My best guess is when anything reproduces mutations may occur in the DNA. Some mutation happened in the DNA and the unicellular organism to start replicating itself. (We see call this mitosis) The mutation turned out to be a good thing and helped the organism survive, later generations through more mutations started orientating the cells into a specific shape... making a whip like tail so it could propel itself forward and so on and so on
The best nature is the Beneficial Nature. It's really hard to get. None of my Pokemon have the Beneficial Nature.
The phenomenon which best explains the role of catalyst in a reaction is that the catalyst lowers the Energy of Activation :)
A paragraph that explains the ideas that two texts share. (apex)
There are a number of synonyms for 'see' but the word that explains in best is perceive.