it is a type of restriction map.
DNA fingerprint
no its classed as a making of your body for people such as police or crime scene investigators
ANS1:Because it is technically possible for more than one person to have a similar DNA fingerprint, but it is impossible for someone to have their DNA fingerprint change. So if your fingerprint is:XXYYXYXAnd the guilty persons DNA is:XXXXYYYIt is impossible for you to be the guilty person. But, it is possible that my DNA fingerprint is also XXXXYYY - so please don't commit any crimes near my house or I might get nailed for it.ANS2:DNA fingerprinting always has a margin of error. The error can introduce reasonable doubt. Guilt in a capital case must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
Both identify a person, the DNA more conclusively because fingerprints are often smeared or partials. A fingerprint has one advantage over DNA if it can be classified as where and when it was made, which can establish a person's presence in a given circumstance. For example, if a fingerprint is in the blood on a weapon, it could only have been made after the blood was there.
They both show the size of DNA fragment due to the number of repeats. They represent the uniqueness of a person's DNA.
The DNA fingerprint of the father is compared with that of the child. If he is the true father, half of the bands on the child's DNA fingerprint will match with the father's, because the father provides half of the child's DNA.
DNA fingerprint
Selected fragments are used to produce a DNA fingerprint.
A DNA fingerprint refers to the fact that a person's DNA code is as unique to that person as his/her fingerprint. A person can be implicated for a crime or ruled out as the criminal based on his/her DNA code.
A DNA fingerprint is really all the genes that are found in in your chromosomes. No two are ever alike except for identical twins (or triplets).
DNA bands that match those in the child's fingerprint and that aren't from the other parent.
yes
genetics purpose and porn
gel electrophoresis
Odiously blood
Because, technically it is not correct. Fingerprint technology is an entirely different discipline and process than the collection, processing, and identifying of DNA evidence. The two procedures have nothing in common and bear no relation to one another. For some reason the phrase"DNA Fingerprinting" has become incorrectly imprinted in the public's mind and causes confusion.
A DNA fingerprint could appear in a few different ways depending on it's use. Sometimes a DNA fingerprint just appears as a series of lines on a square board.