Inorder to produce their copies with the character of interest.
They want to make a bigger population of animals..
made by: Katie Brogli
asexual
Current cloning technology is not good enough to reliably clone anything. The major reason for this is the common fear of "playing god." Also, the cloning attempts that hit the news a few years ago with animals were not true clones.
clone. Clone is the answer!
A Clone !
A clone is an full copy of something with no difference.
NO its not OK to clone animals is it a genetically bonded animal and should not be tampered with x
people clone animal to allow regime and protect the autolayers
they have figured out how to clone animals but not people. True. But it is really just wrong.
they probably use clone skill to clone animals and vegtables to eat
just cause
it is possibe to clone both humans and animals- however it is genetically restricted to females, due to the sex cells (female x&x) (male x&y)
Organisations which help endangered animals will usually have one. They help animals breed again, and if they can't, they clone them.
A clone is any living thing that is a perfect genetic copy of its parent. Plants clone either as one alternative to their natural reproduction or through cuttings. Certain animals are known to clone themselves through parthenogenesis (aphids, salamanders, snakes).
so they could have butsecks with em hahahahah coll
asexual
If cloning became cheap we could mass clone our farm animals to help bring the prices down for what they produce. example-clone a sheep you have more wool, clone a cow you have more beef
Nobody knows.... Nobody's been cloned before. They just have cloned animals. No people yet. They COULD clone a person, but nobody said yes when they asked the pregmant mothers.