Current cloning technology is not good enough to reliably clone anything. The major reason for this is the common fear of "playing god."
Also, the cloning attempts that hit the news a few years ago with animals were not true clones.
clone. Clone is the answer!
No, it is not currently possible to create a clone of a clone. Each clone is a copy of the original organism and does not retain the ability to reproduce on its own.
A clone that has the exact same genes as the organism that made it is called a genetic clone.
Shotgun cloning involves randomly breaking up the DNA of an organism and then piecing it back together, while the clone-by-clone method involves isolating and sequencing individual DNA fragments before assembling them in a specific order. Shotgun cloning is faster but less precise, while the clone-by-clone method is slower but more accurate in genetic engineering techniques.
I saw off a website that when the cloned dolly it cost around $50,000. Also for more information it costs 1.7 million dollars to clone a human and that is the minimum cost. Although the exact cost to clone Dolly the sheep is not publicaly known, experts have estimated around £500,000. For people with religious beliefs and others against cloning, this seems a grand waste of money.
no..... no animal can clone themselves, there are cells in the animal that clone themselves, but an animal cannot just split into two of the same animal.
One would hope that if cloning were allowed, the clones would be defined as people. If they are people then they should have the same rights as people who are not cloned. If people who are not cloned have the right to clone themselves then those who are should have it as well. The word "right" can have a legal and an ethical aspect. The question might be talking about whether the practice is legal or whether it is moral. The Legal Profession treats that sort of question as money in the Bank and will vigorously defend you right to your opinion. The Religious Ethics community will likely oppose any such question until they have debated the question for several years.
they clone themselves when they grow, they grow when they eat.
A clone is any living thing that is a perfect genetic copy of its parent. Plants clone either as one alternative to their natural reproduction or through cuttings. Certain animals are known to clone themselves through parthenogenesis (aphids, salamanders, snakes).
Due to the fact that people would not want to miss their cat that is dead and clone them to have another
It's mostly to do with ethics and laws. Imagine if you were to clone yourself. Would the clone have rights? Would it be a citizen? What if you killed it, or it killed you?
Due to the fact that we can not clone people yet, we don't know yet, but from what we know, yes.
It is very possible that scientists will be able to clone people some day. The laws will stipulate how the cloning can be done.
They are not harmful although baby dollars clone themselves when they sense danger.
you should because if you need a transplant, your clone could donate blood or an organ to you.
No, it will have the same number of chromossomes. Mitosis is when cells clone themselves.
what is ethics