you should because if you need a transplant, your clone could donate blood or an organ to you.
what is ethics
cloning should be banned for humans but people pay to have there pets cloned.
they have figured out how to clone animals but not people. True. But it is really just wrong.
so they could have butsecks with em hahahahah coll
Scientist should not be able to clone humans because it's to difficult to tell the original human from the clone.
One would hope that if cloning were allowed, the clones would be defined as people. If they are people then they should have the same rights as people who are not cloned. If people who are not cloned have the right to clone themselves then those who are should have it as well. The word "right" can have a legal and an ethical aspect. The question might be talking about whether the practice is legal or whether it is moral. The Legal Profession treats that sort of question as money in the Bank and will vigorously defend you right to your opinion. The Religious Ethics community will likely oppose any such question until they have debated the question for several years.
people clone animal to allow regime and protect the autolayers
you could get him a variety of things-clone, t shirt, necklace, mix tape, cd...
to clone things.
he is the clone of Adam Baylin. Jesse is also a clone. They left him in the tube things to let his brain and mental abilities to grow and that is the reason he can do the things he does. Being a clone is also the reason why he has no belly button.
It is believed that it will give the clone a shorter life span
Technically, it should be identical. The DNA should be exactally the same. This is what makes it a clone.