what is ethics
One would hope that if cloning were allowed, the clones would be defined as people. If they are people then they should have the same rights as people who are not cloned. If people who are not cloned have the right to clone themselves then those who are should have it as well. The word "right" can have a legal and an ethical aspect. The question might be talking about whether the practice is legal or whether it is moral. The Legal Profession treats that sort of question as money in the Bank and will vigorously defend you right to your opinion. The Religious Ethics community will likely oppose any such question until they have debated the question for several years.
you should because if you need a transplant, your clone could donate blood or an organ to you.
cloning should be banned for humans but people pay to have there pets cloned.
so they could have butsecks with em hahahahah coll
That's a question that you should ask yourself
Technically, it should be identical. The DNA should be exactally the same. This is what makes it a clone.
There is little to no difference.
get and clone masterballs then do the stuff they tell you to and you should be good get and clone masterballs then do the stuff they tell you to and you should be good
Answer 1I do not think it should be allowed to clone humans and animals let alone anything. It is going against the Lords will, and it can cause harmful side affects in the clone. It can cause them to have mental probablems have shorter life spans. You never know when someone is cloned they might not have same rights.Answer 2This is a question whose answers are incredibly subjective depending on whether people interpret cloning as ethical or not. There are many concerns about cloning including: Would clones be considered humans? What would their rights be? As well as questions about whether it is safe to clone people and what the potential risks about clothing would be? Also, most people feel generally uncomfortable with the idea of clones existing or feel that they are unnatural, as proven by the first response to this question.cell
Due to the fact that people would not want to miss their cat that is dead and clone them to have another
It's mostly to do with ethics and laws. Imagine if you were to clone yourself. Would the clone have rights? Would it be a citizen? What if you killed it, or it killed you?
NO its not OK to clone animals is it a genetically bonded animal and should not be tampered with x