they are too small so they have a greater ratio of surface area.
Most cells are too small to see without the aid of a microscope.
Individual cells are not visible under an electron microscope because the resolution of the microscope is not high enough to distinguish the borders of individual cells. The electron microscope's resolution is limited by the wavelength of electrons used, preventing the visualization of single cells. Cells can be seen collectively as tissues or structures under an electron microscope.
No, human cells are too small to be seen with the naked eye. A microscope is needed to magnify the cells in order to see them.
because cells are too small to see with the human eye
Yes, cells can be seen with a microscope.
All living things large enough to see without a microscope have cells.
Because cells are way to small to see without a microscope.
Most cells are too small to see without the aid of a microscope.
No some cells are large enough for you to see them.
Individual cells are not visible under an electron microscope because the resolution of the microscope is not high enough to distinguish the borders of individual cells. The electron microscope's resolution is limited by the wavelength of electrons used, preventing the visualization of single cells. Cells can be seen collectively as tissues or structures under an electron microscope.
No, human cells are too small to be seen with the naked eye. A microscope is needed to magnify the cells in order to see them.
We need a microscope to see cells because they are too small to see without one.
because cells are too small to see with the human eye
fungi
Because without it we couldn't see cells
Single cells are the smallest cells that can preform all of the function in life and cannot be seen without a microscope. The above answer should say most cells can not be seen without a microscope. There are exceptions to this rule as say a chicken egg or 2 foot long strands of neurons are also single cells.
Yes, cells can be seen with a microscope.