It is unethical
You can produce(clone) anyone any number of times (at different age levels too!!) & all will look nearly same, but with different personalities.
There are greater chances of mutations and that will be really uncontrollable
Its not correct and I am short of words, but I can give u examples
: the migratory birds leave their eggs behind and fly away, these eggs have hatched, hatchlings became adults, learnt to fly and survived. But the same eggs taken to a home, cared for, the hatchlings provided for adequate food are not as smart and their survival rate is far less !
: Why is it that endangered species that are somehow still surviving the wild are not responding to a more comfortable man made setups !
: why is saffron, sandalwood not grown in US !
I can write a lot but the main thing being that secrets of nature are best kept with it, we should not interfere too much into it as it will create much more problems than solutions(which is just to produce an organ - which is of course v.v. imp. to the person who needs it) but do you feel the nuclear energy is v.v. good then ask a Japanese or a chernobyl resident.
The controversy isn't over stem cell therapy, it is over embrionic stem cell therapy. Stem cell therapy usually refers to stem cells extracted from the patients own body. Embrionic stem cells are extracted from dead fetuses. Those opposed to embrionic stem cell therapies are worried that it will lead to 'fetus farms', where eggs are fertilized until a fetus is formed, then the fetus is killed to harvest the stem cells. It is an offshoot of the abortion controversy in which the pro-life side largely believes that life begins at conception (egg fertilization). The controversy around stem cell therapy lies in the research in embryonic stem cells. Some people believe that the start of the embryonic stage is when a human being begins and is therefore unethical to destroy this for the stem cells as it is supposedly akin to murder.
Immortal cell lines are important for biological research because they can be continuously grown in culture, providing a stable and consistent source of cells for experiments. This allows researchers to study cell behavior over time and conduct numerous experiments without the need for constantly obtaining new cells. Immortal cell lines also offer a valuable model for understanding diseases, drug testing, and basic cell biology research.
There is controversy surrounding Monsanto due to concerns about the environmental impact of their genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their aggressive patent protection practices, and the possible health effects of their products. Critics argue that Monsanto's business practices prioritize profits over sustainability and safety.
Stem cells themselves are not controversial. There are different types of stem cells. Hematopoietic stem cells are the building blocks of blood. They are found in bone marrow and umbilical cord blood. They are currently used successfully to treat a number of different diseases. These are not controversial at all. Embryonic stem cells are controversial because they are obtained from embryos. Some people believe that using embryos to produce stem cells is unethical. The 'embryos' the anti-stem cell voice talk about contain about 75 - 200 cells, and are known as blastocytes. The cells are undifferentiated, meaning they as yet have no purpose. The Pro-Life movement refer to this collection of cells as a human being about 2-4 days after fertilization. Blastocytes are the best source of undifferentiated stem cells, and those used would be the excess discarded after IVF. They would generally be destroyed - why not use them to save human life? For Pro-Life- destroy these 'embryos' or use them to save life? Please explain your stance!
To accurately measure algae growth in a research study, you can use methods such as spectrophotometry to measure chlorophyll content, cell counting under a microscope, or measuring biomass through dry weight analysis. These techniques can provide quantitative data on the growth of algae over time.
There is much controversy in pharmaceutical companies and their marketing. Many spend more on advertising than they do dollars for research. In 2004, pharmaceutical companies invested over $1.7 billion in advertising in Canada alone.
He was awarded the nobel peace prize, there was much controversy over this.
Not much controversy at the time, more later in the decades after the war. There are many myths and misstatement of facts surrounding this event during WW2.
The controversy isn't over stem cell therapy, it is over embrionic stem cell therapy. Stem cell therapy usually refers to stem cells extracted from the patients own body. Embrionic stem cells are extracted from dead fetuses. Those opposed to embrionic stem cell therapies are worried that it will lead to 'fetus farms', where eggs are fertilized until a fetus is formed, then the fetus is killed to harvest the stem cells. It is an offshoot of the abortion controversy in which the pro-life side largely believes that life begins at conception (egg fertilization). The controversy around stem cell therapy lies in the research in embryonic stem cells. Some people believe that the start of the embryonic stage is when a human being begins and is therefore unethical to destroy this for the stem cells as it is supposedly akin to murder.
There is a controversy over how to pronounce tomato - you say to-may-to and I say to-mah-to.
The controversy over the No Child Left Behind Act is related to whether it has worked or not
Barack Obama made it legal over the summer.
Pene grande
A government study about the use of hormones in animals.
Yes he was born a Protestant and that is why there is much controversy over his managerial position at Celtic (A typically Catholic club)
The "controversy" seems to be that all the world's countries agreed it was a good idea to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, but when it came to actually doing anything about it, most of them are not doing enough to make much difference.
i love ponies