yes they used them to kill some unliked people and ended up murdering 1400 inocent people
The UN has established treaties and conventions such as the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the Chemical Weapons Convention, and the Biological Weapons Convention to limit the spread and use of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. It also conducts inspections and monitoring programs to ensure compliance with these agreements and works with member states to strengthen their non-proliferation efforts.
Good for whom? The people using them might find them more useful to terrorise their enemies than are conventional weapons. They kill people but cause less physical damage to property than other weapons and are more easily created and less expensive than nuclear weapons. The people being attacked by chemical weapons are often civilians who will experience no good from the use of these weapons, except the possible reactions of those appalled by their use.
i think using chemical weapons in war is not the best idea in the world but if that is all we have to use then i guess we will use it. but i also think that creating a way to kill our enemies without our weapons hurting our soldiers sould be made.
Chemical weapons in World War 1 caused immense suffering, including blindness, burns, and respiratory issues. They led to a new level of brutality in warfare and prompted the development of international agreements to ban their use. The long-term effects of exposure to these weapons also contributed to health issues for many soldiers after the war.
Fritz Haber was a German chemist known for his work in the development of chemical weapons during World War I and for his development of the Haber-Bosch process for creating ammonia. He won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1918 for his contributions to the synthesis of ammonia. However, his legacy is controversial due to his involvement in the use of chemical weapons.
Yes, the United Nations sent a team to Syria to get the chemical weapons.
Weapons of mass destruction (WMD) have been used in conflicts, such as chemical weapons used in the Iran-Iraq War, the use of sarin gas in the Tokyo subway attack, and the suspected use of chemical weapons in Syria. The use of WMD is internationally condemned due to the devastating impact on civilians and the environment.
I think he would not because. Syria already handed over their chemical weapons. But Obama no matter what wants to attack.
According to current negotiations, it does not. The reason that some people make the argument that Israel should have to give up weapons is to create a chemical and nuclear weapons free Middle East. This has the slightly sinister motive of making Israel appear more vulnerable. The premise of Israel having to level with Syria is flawed since while Israel does have nuclear weapons, it has never threatened to use them nor has it actually used them. Conversely, Syria has both threatened to use and has used chemical weapons both in war and against civilian populations. Those who misuse such weapons should be punished whereas those who do not need not be bothered.
The common justification is having weapons of mass destruction. Iraq was accused of having nuclear weapons that proved later to not true. Syria was accused of using chemical weapons against Syrian people although the inspection team have not yet proved whether the chemical weapons used by the government or by the opposition.
Dismantling chemical weapons is important because chemical weapons can cause damage to a larger group of people giving them illnesses, birth defects, defects in their body and leads to many deaths as we have seen in some cases like Syria.
Syria has never had any nuclear weapons.
Because they're cheap, effective and don't destroy roads, houses or equipment.
syria sources say they have stock piles of chemical/biological weapons althought there weapons are old they have lots of it.
Very probable Al-Qaeda don't use chemical weapons.
No, chemical weapons disperse quickly within a short distance of the release point. They are unfortunately rather unpredictable often affecting the user as well as the target. If used in Damascus, Syria it is unlikely that there will be any effects outside the city. Excellent question.
blistering-mustard-agent(mustard gas), V.X.-nerve-agent, sarin-nerve-agent.