Leukippus and Democritus proposed 2 500 years ago, intuitively, an atomc theory.
There are no known reports of a chemical bond in this period.
John Dalton. N.B.: John Dalton [born: September 6, 1776; died: July 27, 1844, at age 67] was an English chemist and physicist who claimed matter was made up of tiny particles and that these particles were identical for any given kind of matter. Moreover, he claimed these particles were indivisible and could neither be created nor destroyed in any chemical process, only be altered in the manner they were grouped.
In 335 BCE, Aristotle opened his school, Lucem. He did not believe the Atomic theory and therefore taught his students that all substances were not made up of atoms but something smaller. He believed that everything was made up of small amounts of fire, water, earth and air.
Dalton's theory was more successful than Democritus's theory because of evidence. Evidence existed to support Dalton's theory. While Democritus didn't have any evidence to back up his theory.
FeS, though that is not a very stable form.
I don't believe that this compound exist now.
I believe it is Democritus
no
Around 400 BC Democritus a Greek philosopher theorized that everything was composed of small indivisible particles he called atoms or "atomos".
The ancient Greek philosopher Democritus is credited with being the first person to use the term "atom" to describe the fundamental particles of matter. Democritus proposed that all matter is composed of tiny, indivisible particles called atoms.
Aristotle believed that matter was continuous and infinitely divisible, in contrast to Democritus who proposed that matter was composed of indivisible particles called atoms. Aristotle's view prevailed until the development of modern atomic theory in the 19th century.
Aristotle had more people believe in his ideas than Democritus. Aristotle's teachings greatly influenced Western philosophy and science, while Democritus's atomic theory was not widely accepted during his time.
No, Aristotle did not believe matter was made of atoms. He believed in the concept of the four elements - earth, water, air, and fire - as the building blocks of matter. This perspective was later challenged by the atomic theory proposed by Democritus and further developed by modern scientists.
No, Aristotle did not believe in the existence of atoms. He proposed that matter is continuous and can be subdivided infinitely. His views on the nature of matter differed significantly from the atomic theory later proposed by Democritus.
He believed no
Democritus did not believe that matter was infinitely divisible. Instead, he proposed that matter is composed of small, indivisible particles called atoms, which cannot be divided further. He theorized that these atoms are the fundamental building blocks of all matter, and while they can combine in various ways to form different substances, the atoms themselves remain indivisible. This idea marked a significant departure from the notion of continuous matter.
not after his 2009 accident with her. he has a new girlfriend, that was said that he proposed to her, but i dont believe it lol.
Democritus believed that matter was made up of indivisible particles called atoms, which differed in shape and size, leading to the diversity observed in nature. Aristotle, on the other hand, proposed a continuous matter theory where substances were composed of combinations of the four elements (earth, water, air, fire) and did not believe in the existence of indivisible particles like atoms.