Neither; it is an elemental metal and not a compound at all.
CuSO4 is an ionic compound. This is because it is composed of a metal (Cu) and a nonmetal (S and O), which typically form ionic bonds through the transfer of electrons.
Cu(NO2)3 doesn't exist, but Cu(NO2)2 does. It is ionic, even though the NO2 anion is covalent.
Cu is a metal and OH- is a an ion consisting of two nonmetals A compound is almost always ionic if it is a metal bonded with a nonmetal. Thus, CuOH2 (Copper(II) Hydroxide) is ionic.
The name of the ionic compound Cu(NO₃)₂ is copper(II) nitrate.
A telephone receiver is not a compound itself, but the materials used to make it can be either ionic or covalent compounds. The components of a telephone receiver, such as plastics and metals, are typically made of covalent compounds.
CuSO4 is an ionic compound. This is because it is composed of a metal (Cu) and a nonmetal (S and O), which typically form ionic bonds through the transfer of electrons.
Cu donates electrons to Br to form CuBr. It is a crystalline compound. The bonds have mixed ionic and covalent characters.
Cu(NO2)3 doesn't exist, but Cu(NO2)2 does. It is ionic, even though the NO2 anion is covalent.
Chlorine oxide would be a covalent compound, and not an ionic compound.
is carbon an tretaflouride ionic or covalent compound
Cu is a metal and OH- is a an ion consisting of two nonmetals A compound is almost always ionic if it is a metal bonded with a nonmetal. Thus, CuOH2 (Copper(II) Hydroxide) is ionic.
The name of the ionic compound Cu(NO₃)₂ is copper(II) nitrate.
What I had found is that it is an Ionic compound
Ionic Compound.
It is an ionic compound.
H2CO3 is a covalent compound. It is composed of nonmetals, which typically form covalent bonds by sharing electrons.
i think it it covalent