No because a abundant # is a number where the sum of its proper factors is greater than itself. 16 is not an abundant number because the sum of its proper factors is (15) less than itself.
Yes, 25 is an abundant number because the sum of its proper divisors (1, 5) is greater than the number itself (25 < 6).
The element with mass number 12 is carbon. The atomic number for carbon is 6.
The atomic number is equal to the number of protons. So the atomic number is 16.
16 The atomic number of an element is always the same as the number of protons in an atom of the element.
The number of protons and neutrons is 16 protons and 16 neutrons.
No 16 is deficient.12 and 18 are abundant.
16 is not a deficent number because it is a abundant number
No. The proper divisors of 32 are 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. Their sum, 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 = 31, which is less than 32, so it is not an abundant number.
60 is abundant.
If a number is not abundant it cannot be made abundant!
72 is an abundant number.
abundant
67 is an abundant number.
No, 29 is not an abundant number.
abundant
350 is an abundant number.
Abundant numbers are positive integers for which the sum of their proper divisors (excluding the number itself) exceeds the number. For example, the smallest abundant number is 12, since its divisors (1, 2, 3, 4, 6) sum to 16, which is greater than 12. Other examples include 18, 20, and 24. The sequence of abundant numbers is infinite, and they play a significant role in number theory.