0
What else can I help you with?
Is epoxy resin considered a type of plastic material?
Yes, epoxy resin is considered a type of plastic material.
Is glass considered a solid material?
Yes, glass is considered a solid material because it has a definite shape and volume, and its particles are closely packed together in a fixed arrangement.
Is bituminous material is the same for bituminous concrete if not why?
No, bituminous material and bituminous concrete are not the same. Bituminous material refers to the binder, typically asphalt, used in asphalt pavement mixtures. Bituminous concrete, on the other hand, refers to the final pavement product made by combining bituminous material with aggregates like sand and stone.
What is difference between raw material and bulk raw material?
Raw material refers to any material used to make a final product, while bulk raw material specifically refers to materials that are purchased and stored in large quantities for manufacturing purposes. Bulk raw materials are typically purchased in large quantities to take advantage of economies of scale and are stocked in warehouses until needed for production.
Is packing material direct material?
Packing material can be considered direct material if it is an essential part of the final product being manufactured. For example, if the packing material is required to package and ship the product to customers, then it would be classified as a direct material.
What does obsceinity mean?
Obscenity refers to offensive or sexually explicit language, images, or behavior that is considered indecent or inappropriate in public settings. It can involve containing material that is considered offensive or lewd.
What is legal test for obscenity?
The Miller Test is the current "test" used by Supreme Court Justices for obscenity. It basically states that if a creation has no artistic value whatsoever ("filth for the sake of filth") then it can be considered obscene.
When was Morbid Obscenity created?
Morbid Obscenity was created in 2006.
When was Twin Obscenity created?
Twin Obscenity was created in 1991.
Why has the supreme court upheld prohibition of obscenity?
The Supreme Court has upheld the prohibition of obscenity primarily because it is considered not to have any redeeming social value and can be harmful to societal morals and welfare. The Court distinguishes obscenity from protected speech under the First Amendment, often referencing the Miller test, which assesses whether material is obscene based on community standards, depiction of sexual conduct, and lack of serious artistic or scientific value. This legal framework aims to balance individual freedoms with the need to maintain public decency and order.
What is the three part obscenity test?
The three-part obscenity test, established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), determines whether material is obscene and thus unprotected by the First Amendment. The criteria are: (1) whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the material appeals to prurient interests; (2) whether the material depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way as defined by state law; and (3) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. If any part of the test is not met, the material may not be considered obscene.
Did the case of Miller v. California (1973) deal with the issues of obscenity and the opinion was written by Warren Burger?
Yes, the case of Miller v. California (1973) addressed issues of obscenity. The Supreme Court established the Miller test, which provided a three-part standard to determine whether material is considered obscene and thus not protected by the First Amendment. The opinion was indeed written by Chief Justice Warren Burger.
When was Vicinity of Obscenity created?
Vicinity of Obscenity was created in 2006.
What is Obscenity as jean baudrillard defines it?
Jean Baudrillard defines obscenity as the absence of taboo or the loss of a sense of shame in contemporary society. He argues that in a culture saturated with images and signs, what was once considered obscene has now become normalized, rendering it meaningless and empty of any critical or subversive potential. Baudrillard suggests that obscenity in today's world is characterized by the excess of information and simulated realities that blur the boundaries between reality and representation.
What is the result of miller vs California?
The decision reiterated that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment and established the Miller test for determining what constituted obscene material.
Did the case of Miller v California deal with the issues of obscenity and the opinion was written by wareen burger?
Miller v California was a Landmark United States Supreme Court case that changes the precedence involving what constitutes unprotected obscenity for First Amendment purposes. The decision reiterated that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment and established the a test called the Miller Test for determining what material was deemed obscene.
What does this mean One mans obscenity is anothers lyric?
It means what may be considered foul or distasteful to one person, may be considered beautiful or artful. As in "one man's trash is another man's treasure."
