In a personal argument the use of obscenity.
The Miller Test is the current "test" used by Supreme Court Justices for obscenity. It basically states that if a creation has no artistic value whatsoever ("filth for the sake of filth") then it can be considered obscene.
Yes, the case of Miller v. California (1973) addressed issues of obscenity. The Supreme Court established the Miller test, which provided a three-part standard to determine whether material is considered obscene and thus not protected by the First Amendment. The opinion was indeed written by Chief Justice Warren Burger.
Miller v California was a Landmark United States Supreme Court case that changes the precedence involving what constitutes unprotected obscenity for First Amendment purposes. The decision reiterated that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment and established the a test called the Miller Test for determining what material was deemed obscene.
U.S. obscenity law is based on the Miller Test that was established by the 1973 Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. California. The three parts of the Miller Test are: whether the average person, in an average setting, would find the work sexual in nature; whether the work demonstrates blatantly offensive sexual behavior as defined by law; and whether the work lacks any redeeming value on any level.
Morbid Obscenity was created in 2006.
Twin Obscenity was created in 1991.
National Security, Fighting Words and Obscenity
Vicinity of Obscenity was created in 2006.
He screamed nothing but obscenity at the police officers and got arrested as a result.Obscenity is not allowed in the Answers community.It is not very nice to spout obscenity at people.
according to potter stewart, obscenity is not defined because you would knw it, once you see it.
Obscenity Prosecution Task Force ended in 2011.